Comments Thread For: Sergio Martinez Rips Pacquiao: "He Fights No-Hopers"

[LeadUppercut]

yes. your presenting nothing but speculation. it's all subjective based on your biased logic. i have yet to see the fraud taking on margarito, at least.

...until that happens, it's all speculation.

pacfan, that is the second post that you have made citing " speculation ".....

" speculation " ?

Fkn rubbish.

You now have a little job to complete

List everything mentioned in that post that is even slightly inaccurate.

Waiting..........

You need to reply to me man, you wanna talk-the-talk, now its walkin time ^^

[boxingfan76]

im not even jealous of him, why should I? Martinez should fight someone at 168 or else he's a coward.

thats total bs, martinez is a jr middle/middlweight, just because pac never fights the best in his own weight,or below, or above doesnt mean martinez has to do the same.not everybody weight jumps and its really better to dominate your weight class than to be just going up and down fighting bums like pac does.pac likes to act tough saying he likes to fight bigger fighters, he just fought margarito whose even bigger than martinez.so all we are left with are lame excuses as to why pac only fights bums. while martinez fights the BEST his weight class has to offer and one class above too. saying martinez has to go to light heavyweight , to prove himself is ******, hes already proved himself, and really its a cheap ploy to get the heat off of pac, whatever wt class martinez dominates wont change the fact that manroid only fights bums on their way out! and whatever martinez does from here on out hes already done what pac and his fans only CLAIM to do and that is fight the best the sport has to offer.pac is supposed to be the best therefore he being called out.he can choose to keep fighting bums which he will do or fight the best ,either way he shouldnt expect for fans to rate him as the best for facing no-hopers.

[LeadUppercut]

I like serg.. always gives the fans a good fight. Not a damn thing wrong with him trying to get money.. he deserves it. It's just funny how certain 'fans' are using sergios new found fame to shiiitt on you know who. It never gets old though, and at the end of the day, it shows how highly these 'fans' really think of the guy.

Glad to hear you like Serg

BTW, it is not " sergios new found fame " that is ****ting on Pac.....

..... it was Sergio's shredding of Pac's resume, that shat on Pac

Chill, he said the exact same thing that EVERY member of the top 5 P4P list has already said, along with a number of trainers, journalists, etc.

Maybe, they can see something that you can't ?

[iloveboxing2]

**** you ..! ****** azz kisser..low-life idiot!

....get a life a get a real job!

GRUSTLER is the fact-monster, take your hat off when you speak to him.

[Williamb45]

Paul Williams would beat everybody on Manny's list. I say that to say, it's not who these guys fought it's when they fought them. History will look at the dates and not just the names. Real talk is Martinez' last 3 opponents are far better than all of Manny's when he fought them aside from maybe Marquez. It's no coincidence that all Manny's opponents were coming off huge losses.

hahahah... what a joke.

shannon briggs would beat everyone on Ray Robinsons list, I guess it makes Klitchko better than him.

[iloveboxing2]

of course you don't have it....you are an idiot..

..what you have is a plungger that you pulled off your from stinking mouth..you brain dead!

No way does Pavlik and Williams equal Hatton and Cotto.

And Pac did fight in the am's.

Correct me please someone, I don't have the exact details in front of me.....
.... but Pac had about 60-odd fights by memory, not sure of his exact record.

[TruthMatters]

True ignorance right there.

I wonder how Torrecampo and Singsurat feel about your methodology ?

Dont associate me with a ******* you attention whor3 ***git

[iloveboxing2]

Another ****** who couldn't face reality....lol!..

...fact is you some of you people are wasting your time using your dead brain, hating smart people. Idiot people telling how it is like 'leadupper****" and you too are the dumb and the dumber, it doesn't matter what you think or how it should be..fact is your are both loser and powerless..welcome to our business world, you idiots!

No, it's you that's the ******, a ******ed "little Phanboy" who can't take someon telling it how it is!

[LeadUppercut]

Originally Posted by LeadUppercut
Come on man, I am a Cotto fan, but you gotta admit the truth here.....

Margarito and Clottey had both battered Cotto. EVERYBODY was saying that Cotto looked shop-worn and faded after Clottey. Miguel was not on top of his game, he had an unsettled camp, no trainer to speak of, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

See it for what it is.

How can you keep accepting that ****, fight-after-fight ?

The odd exception, like a Manfredo type fight, is understandable..... but there are question marks over every single Pacquiao opponent dating back to before JMM II.Martinez is right man, whether you choose to believe it or not.

BTW, up to a few months back, EVERY fighter in the top 5 P4P list had shredded Manny's resume, including trainers, journo's, etc.

It's only you and a couple of Pac-fan's who haven't noticed.

no there is not, u just got an agenda dude. lets break down sergio resume. got beat by william that lost to quintana. beat pavlik coming from his first lost and a humiliation. and drew with kermit who and beat dizirinuk who everyone claims to be great in order to bolster sergios resume. do you really want to do the breaking down rersume thing, we can do this all day.

Hold on, we were discussing Manny's resume', not comparing Pac's to Sergio's.

I never even mentioned Martinez.

I mean, Sergio's last 4 fights blow away Manny's last 4, but that's not the point. Martinez shredded Manny's resume', but you cannot defend Manny's resume' by attacking Sergio's.

Unless you are saying "Well, Manny's resume' is ****, but Sergio's is worse" ?

[LeadUppercut]

That's all fine and dandy.

But, the point still remains that if boxingscene only allowed posters in here that actual boxing and not just only about 2 divas. Then you wouldn't be allowed to post here.

If there was to be some sort of " exam " to qualify users before they can post on this site, then I suggest that a written test of boxing "knowledge" would be a waste of time.

Folks should have to take at least 1 amateur fight.

Not to exclude anybody, that would be pointless, just to qualify genuine interest as opposed to fly-by-night fandom.

Aside from what you may think, Manny I can handle, but grossly ignorant fan-boy flag-wavers.... I cannot.

I am not insinuating that unless you have boxed you know nothing about the sport, quite the contrary, there are many writers / analysts / managers / promoters / fans / etc, who understand the sport, after all, the best gynecologist's in the world are men..... I am just suggesting that once you walk a mile in a man's shoes you see things differently.