Dear Sergio, P4P means challenging fighters up the weight ladder, not downward...
Collapse
-
a whole bunch of *******s made the same atg ranking argument. by that logic rjj and b-hop can still be p4p because what they have done and that they are still active. its wrong and real boxing fans know that only a few ******* nutjobs hate martinez and argue pacs atg status against a p4p argument. ive have owned your pathetic hater a$$ to many times to remember now.Comment
-
Martinez is 36 years old and he needs to make as much from the sport as he can with his remaining years - that means fighting people like Mayweather and Pacquiao, both of whom have fought and won titles at 154. Martinez would be weakening himself getting back down to 154 just as much as Mayweather or Pacquiao would be weakened by rising up to 154 again.
Martinez will never get a chance at Pacquiao or Mayweather though. Pacquiao would happily fight him, but Arum is a crafty old ****er and won't let Pacquiao near any big man who isn't static. Mayweather would fight him if the money was ridiculous, but he's too busy beating up women and brown-nosing Fiddy to even think about it right now.Comment
-
Comment
-
Martinez started at WW is not fighting at MW. Is a 2 division title holder.
So he has moved up...So lets not act like he doesn't.
And, you don't need to move up to be known as P4P.
Pep, never moved up was a featherweight his whole career. And, you will not find a credible list that doesn't have Pep top 10 P4P ATG....
No need to move up.
Yes Martinez has a case to be P4P #1 for people to say he doesn't is ridiculous. I personally have him at #2...But, honestly he can be anywhere from 1-5 in a P4P ranking.Comment
-
a whole bunch of *******s made the same atg ranking argument. by that logic rjj and b-hop can still be p4p because what they have done and that they are still active. its wrong and real boxing fans know that only a few ******* nutjobs hate martinez and argue pacs atg status against a p4p argument. ive have owned your pathetic hater a$$ to many times to remember now.
another twisted & horribly wrong logic.
owned me many times? LMFAAOOOOO.
sure *****.Comment
-
a whole bunch of *******s made the same atg ranking argument. by that logic rjj and b-hop can still be p4p because what they have done and that they are still active. its wrong and real boxing fans know that only a few ******* nutjobs hate martinez and argue pacs atg status against a p4p argument. ive have owned your pathetic hater a$$ to many times to remember now.
At the end of the day is all an opinion matter. There is no, I repeat NO official P4P ranking. There is no, I repeat NO true criteria on how to rank P4P....Everybody had there own way.
The true definition of P4P on how it was created. Who is the best, if everything was equal, size, height, reach, weight and that would be P4P. That was the idea.
Some people like to use who you beat, which is fine as well. resumes and accomplishment and all of that. Is all good because at the end of the day is just a mythical opinion based ranking.
When I create, I have my own personal criteria, I look a lot at who you beat, I hold that the main factor, and I go back as far as 3 years...Nothing more than 36 months on who you beat. 36 month is still recent and yet long enough to see the level of comp being faced. And, then secondary I take into account if everything was equal in terms of size who would win.
I got Pac #1 P4P, Martinez #2, Floyd #3, JMM #4, and Donaire #5. That's my top 5.
And, yours could be completely different and it's fine as well. Because, at the end of the day this ranking is not official. It just a mythical based opinion ranking.Comment
-
Comment
Comment