Originally posted by Check
View Post
But, a good athlete is just that. The sport then trains them a certain way. Rugby will train them to be big, strong and fast. Much bigger and stronger than BBall because they need to be. They do more weight and strength training. If they did more speed training they would be faster.
They aren't like that from the moment they come out of the womb. Every sport trains their athletes a certain way.
It's still an interesting argument though: Why do you think it's only in the US that all the great athletes have gone to ball games etc and not Europe where soccer/football and other games are not only much bigger and more popular, but they are more widespread, the players get more fame and money and it takes just as much athleticism?
It's a bit of a double standard there. I think it's as much a case of a bad generation than anything along with the promotion and corruption of boxing killing it off in general. Although it's not dead and never will be, boxing is a dying sport. The best fighters are not as good all around anymore, the overall competition is much weaker and the trainers and gyms are lacking severely. It's a combination of lots of things.
But, if it's true for the US that all the great boxers are playing other sports, in which money and fame are greater, then it's just as true for Europe as sport is even bigger over there and the rewards even greater, unless you kick an own goal, lose the game for your side and get killed by crazed fans.

Comment