Originally posted by IMDAZED
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Continues The Verbal Bashing of Pacquiao
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JQside View PostI don't believe you. You're probably guilty if you even put any attention to it.
You're only saying this because you're trying to justify your hatred against a guy you don't even know personally.
Where I come from if you accuse an innocent person of stealing, cheating or anything at all, get ready to hide in the mountains or go abroad or something.
I for one will burn your house.
So u and ur family will totally understand when I come and burn your house down, right? U just called me a cheater. So there are consequences in your little world.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheSurgeonMDMPH View PostJust like I thought!
So u and ur family will totally understand when I come and burn your house down, right? U just called me a cheater. So there are consequences in your little world.
You are all fairgames now. I can accuse you of anything without proof. If you want to prove you're not, do so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostIt is true that Tim Smith said a trusted source provided details of emails where Pac's lawyers wanted a gag order on any positive test. It's not true that you have proof this was fabricated as we can all clearly see.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jack2x View Postits good that you agreed....again isn't it true that if the email is legit then it is so easy for atlas and smith to show the world that indeed pac's is on roids and will prove that atlas,smith and the mayweather's claim on pac's are all true and will vindicate them...then why can''t they produce the so called email????
Again there is really no way of proving it's fabricated. So you shouldn't go that route.
Because, it can easily be said that if what they said were falls. Then why not sue them like they did with the rest of the clan?
Exactly...Now I gotta go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostBut, that's damn near asking a reporter to give up their source...Why would they do that? That means they can't be trusted and probably will be hard to get more scoop.
Again there is really no way of proving it's fabricated. So you shouldn't go that route.
Because, it can easily be said that if what they said were falls. Then why not sue them like they did with the rest of the clan?
Exactly...Now I gotta go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNo, because he's five years old and reporters must give up sources so he can feel better (ie. discredit it anyway).
What do they call that again...... I think it is something like passing the buck?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostBut, that's damn near asking a reporter to give up their source...Why would they do that? That means they can't be trusted and probably will be hard to get more scoop.
Again there is really no way of proving it's fabricated. So you shouldn't go that route.
Because, it can easily be said that if what they said were falls. Then why not sue them like they did with the rest of the clan?
Exactly...Now I gotta go.
then why did they stop talking about the email(that can bring down pac) if they deemed that they are likely to be sued????( i know that you can't answer this one)...and if this is true then are the mayweather's so dumb that they wont used this email to prove that their accusation on pac is true in court....the lawsuit could have been quash by now.
Comment
Comment