Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Continues The Verbal Bashing of Pacquiao

[V.WEBB]

my location and race is not important in this discussion ...your veering away from the issue..are you not aware that the media was hard on pac when pac flip flops on osdt in their 1st negotiation???...they only changed their tune when pac agreed to compromise..and one such instances is his interview during the pac/ margo conference last november and was asked by several media personnel regarding osdt that pac said that he and freddie agreed to floyd osdt and they wanted to know what's behind floyd flip flopping regarding his flawed osdt..so, if the media and floyd's team think that pac is bluffing then all the mayweather's could have done is to call pac's challenged but did anyone heard from the mayweather's???none! isn't it?..all they do is to keep on repeating about pac's on roid etc.. so, how can the media hate a boxer who wanted to compromised?

It is important, because you just making statements that just aren't true.

You said - "bcoz, majority of sports scribes are not bias towards a certain boxer." Based on that comment, I asked what I asked.

[jack2x]

[QUOTE=IMDAZED;10209117]That's false. They were easy on him from the get go. It was almost hilarious. Pac is doing a nice job of spoiling his goodwill in boxing. One more ****ty fight will do the trick--for some, anyway.[/QU


funny......when you say that what i stated is false!...remember that they even fabricated an issue about an email circulating that is so called detrimental to pac's legacy...that's the height of media bias that even floyd never got the same treatment until now.

[IMDAZED]

funny......when you say that what i stated is false!...remember that they even fabricated an issue about an email circulating that is so called detrimental to pac's legacy...that's the height of media bias that even floyd never got the same treatment until now.

I don't remember any "fabrication." Someone proved it false? How and when? Also, who is "they?" It was one journalist and one analyst.

[jack2x]

It is important, because you just making statements that just aren't true.

You said - "bcoz, majority of sports scribes are not bias towards a certain boxer." Based on that comment, I asked what I asked.

isnt it true that during the 1st nego.pac got blasted by the media WHEN HE FLIP FLOPS ON OSDT???? if you say no then it is useless to disscuss with you coz your clearly bias towards pac.

[V.WEBB]

Accusing a boxer with no proof will not get you any sympathy from normal people. Normal people are willing to wait for the evidence to surface. Especially now that the whole thing is handled by the courts. Which means the government has all the power in the world to prove and disprove the accusations. So far none has.

Even if such boxer is using peds, normal people don't normally assume peds willl win you fights. That's how horrible ****** people who makes these accusations are into. Normal people will never buy it. In addition, normal people would never assume that a boxer with a profile as high as Pacquiao's would take a risk using peds in big events as he normally fights in.

It's a losing battle for the idiot accusers. Best thing to do is apologize and fight in the ring like they always have with standard terms. That's how you correct the wrong.

Who are "normal" people?

This was one of my first posts in this regard

I'm not talking about a 7 day compromise. I'm talking about all of the excuses, lies, and contradictions. They were overlooked by the media. Which takes us back to my original statement. They like one guy and hate the other.

The above is what I'm talking about. Save the other stuff for another argument. The media loves Manny, THUS, his lies, excuses, and contradictions regarding the drug testing went LARGELY overlooked in the media. Period. Point. Blank.

[jack2x]

I don't remember any "fabrication." Someone proved it false? How and when? Also, who is "they?" It was one journalist and one analyst.

now, you don't remember... flip flopping right?...it was even disscuss for several days that it only died down when "SENSISIBLE" media asked for proof.

[IMDAZED]

now, you don't remember... flip flopping right?...it was even disscuss for several days that it only died down when "SENSISIBLE" media asked for proof.

No, and that's a lie. Stop talking out of your ass. Show me where someone proved it was "fabricated."

[V.WEBB]

isnt it true that during the 1st nego.pac got blasted by the media WHEN HE FLIP FLOPS ON OSDT???? if you say no then it is useless to disscuss with you coz your clearly bias towards pac.

Pac, blasted by the media? Um...no. The media (as a whole) questioned/criticized Floyd for asking more than Manny for not going through with it.

[TheSurgeonMDMPH]

lol, you know damn well who it was and I'll tell your corny ass why.

When you have someone one ignore,

you can't see who they responded to, only that they posted. It says, "this user is on your ignore list" and lists the name of the user. It doesn't even say if they responded to anyone, only that they posted. However, it does give you the option to "view post", which is exactly what you did. You clicked on "view post", you saw that it was me, saw that I crushed your ****** logic, and you ran, like a Mayweather.

sit down clown! u crushing anyone's logic is highly unlikely. the majority of your posts are filled with profane insults and childlike opinions. ur not that smart, especially cosigning all the shyt from the cheaters side.

[IMDAZED]

Pac, blasted by the media? Um...no. The media (as a whole) questioned/criticized Floyd for asking more than Manny for not going through with it.

It's barely been a year and they're already trying to re-write the story.