Originally posted by CUNG LE
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather: "14 day deal was off the table a year ago"
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostFor starters, the chronology.
Pacquiao turned down 14 days not Mayweather. And didn't budge on 24. Selected an opponent and moved on. Didn't budge on 24 until July 2010.
So again, what in my post is false?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Postwhere in my post did I say any of that? Go back and look, I never said pac didn't turn down 14 days the first time, we know this already. You're being difficult just to be difficult.
So again, what in my post is false?
so he talked specifically about how he demanded a 14 day cutoff then when pacquiao accepted it he decided to say no that's no longer good enough?
1. Dec-Jan: Mayweather says full testing, Manny says 30.
2. End of Jan: Mediator is hired to work out compromise. Mayweather drops to 14, Pacquiao 24. Pacquiao walks away from fight.
3. February: Mayweather-Mosley under full-testing. Mayweather states that the 14 days is off the table and wants full testing as he initially asked for. Pacquiao maintains a stance of 24 days.
July 2010: Pacquiao says he's agreed to full testing. On July 7, when pressed by the LA Times, Arum admits that they are asking for a 14 day cutoff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostHave it your way.
False. Change the order and you got it. Let's do a simple timeline:
1. Dec-Jan: Mayweather says full testing, Manny says 30.
2. End of Jan: Mediator is hired to work out compromise. Mayweather drops to 14, Pacquiao 24. Pacquiao walks away from fight.
3. February: Mayweather-Mosley under full-testing. Mayweather states that the 14 days is off the table and wants full testing as he initially asked for. Pacquiao maintains a stance of 24 days.
July 2010: Pacquiao says he's agreed to full testing. On July 7, when pressed by the LA Times, Arum admits that they are asking for a 14 day cutoff.
You must be having a hard time today.
Nothing I stated is false.
You're talking about the first negotiations, which I'm not talking about. I specifically mentioned about how pac agreed to the 14 days (the second time around) and Floyd said no. Now that's all of a sudden not good enough anymore for floyd.
maybe *****s and *******s and everyone in-between can reach an agreement that Pac SHOULD HAVE accepted the 14 days the first time around and floyd SHOULD HAVE accepted the second time around. Hopefully third times the charm.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostYou must be having a hard time today.
Nothing I stated is false.
You're talking about the first negotiations, which I'm not talking about. I specifically mentioned about how pac agreed to the 14 days (the second time around) and Floyd said no. Now that's all of a sudden not good enough anymore for floyd.
maybe *****s and *******s and everyone in-between can reach an agreement that Pac SHOULD HAVE accepted the 14 days the first time around and floyd SHOULD HAVE accepted the second time around. Hopefully third times the charm.Last edited by IMDAZED; 02-15-2011, 07:34 PM.
Comment
-
Comment