You must be joking. Judah wasn't any more shot when he fought either. If anything he was more motivated for the Clottey fight because it was his last shot at redemption.
No, Baldomir beat Judah pre Cotto beating, Clottey beat Judah post Cotto beating. Judah was faded by the time Clottey got to him. Clottey beat Judah 2 years after Baldomir beat him. And, where did I mention Judah was shot? I said a better version which is true. But, the time Judah got to Clottey he was faded. The only guys I said were shot was Corrales and Gatti not Judah.
Floyd/Baldomir was a joke fight and everyone knows it. Baldomir is a journeyman and nothing more who was lucky enough to step into the right with an overrated underachiever in Judah.
That same Baldomir holds a win over Clottey. Also, that same baldomir holds a win over Judah which is Clottey best win in his WW resume. But, Baldomir beat a better version of Judah.
How is Floyd ahead of Clottey? Cuz' he beat a 38 year old Mosley? I thought you had something against shot fighters, but it doesn't apply to Floyd?
I didn't count Mosley, I mentioned decade. So I only counted from 2000-2009. Floyd fought Mosley in 2010. However, Floyd has a win over Judah. Which is still the best win of Clottey resume at WW. And, has a win over Baldomir who beat Clottey and Floyd win over JMM is better than Clottey win over Corrales. So I don't see how you could have Clottey over Floyd TBH.
Clottey also wanted Mosley and Cintron but couldnt' get the fights. Fraud wanted no part of any of those guys.
Does Clottey have wins over these guys? If not then don't mention them cuz' they don't count for resume and accomplishment. He doesn't get extra credit for some fantasize crap.
I would rank both ahead of Mayweather because I doubt Mayweather would beat, or much less fight a prime Forrest, Spinks or Mayorga.
You can rank Forrest, Spinks, and Mayorg ahead of Floyd at WW. I won't argue with that. All 3 have the better singular win than Floyd. Really I would rank both Forrest and Mayorga ahead of Floyd. Spinks is debatable but I won't argue if you have Spinks ahead of Floyd. i could see that and might agree with that.
The way I see it, if Buster Douglass could k.o Tyson, imagine what a prime Larry Holmes would've done to him?
Prime Holmes did everything Douglass did by 100 times over.
Yeah, but did you really know Mike Tyson? Were you watching him back in the 80's all the way up to the Douglas fight? If you were, you would know Tyson wasn't at his best that night. No need to explain it, either you know or you don't.
Exactly, but you are comparing the Douglas fight when Tyson was not in his prime, to how he would have done against a prime Holmes. You sound like a hater to me.
Comment