Had Tyson had knocked out or at least beaten Lewis...

[ZABJUDAH#1P4P]

So what if he used a few tricks. Its part of boxing. Holyfield was already past his physical prime and had to use intelligence and ring savy to win fights at that point.

thats not ring savy thats flat out cheating. the headbutt in the seventh round was awful and really ****ed tyson up badly.

[The Troll]

thats not ring savy thats flat out cheating. the headbutt in the seventh round was awful and really ****ed tyson up badly.

Tyson was dominated in that fight from round one. He was knocked down in the 6th the headbut did not change the course of the fight at all.

[ZABJUDAH#1P4P]

Tyson was dominated in that fight from round one. He was knocked down in the 6th the headbut did not change the course of the fight at all.

but tyson landed some good punches up to the 5th round. remember in the 5th when he threw a right hook to the body and then and uppercut that buckled holyfield. dont tell me the headbutts and elbows didnt have an effect on tyson.

[The Troll]

I remember Tyson landing about one good combination in that fight. I think it was in the 5th round. A left to the body and then an uppercut besides than it was nill for him. One good combination in an entire fight is really nothing gloat about. And it didn't buckle Holyfield.

[dublion1]

tyson would have to be cause he would have beat lewis who beat holyfield who beat tyson.

just like you have to consider barrera better than pacman even though he lost to him.

barrera beat morales, who beat pac, who beat barrera.

anyway tyson was drugged for the lewis fight if he would have been more aggressive he could of koed him. the first round was good for him but then that was it.

but remember, styles makes fights, so just because barrera beat morales, that doesnt mean that he can convincingly beat pacman, their styles just dont match.

[RAESAAD]

He did'nt so who cares Tyson is never going to be better than he really was by making up Hypothetical situations what if ,what if It is what it is.Tyson was O.K.

[riz]

holyfield the best out of the 3, hes ****in himself up tho right now

[riz]

tyson would have to be cause he would have beat lewis who beat holyfield who beat tyson.

just like you have to consider barrera better than pacman even though he lost to him.

barrera beat morales, who beat pac, who beat barrera.

anyway tyson was drugged for the lewis fight if he would have been more aggressive he could of koed him. the first round was good for him but then that was it.

y do u hav to consider barrera better than him
IMO barrera is nothing man, morales is the best

barrera doesn't take on the toughest he can find
morales does
and he stays active like mad

takes on chavez, then hernandez, then barrera, then morales, then raheem (which is suppose to be a tuenup), then most likely will face pac again
barera loses to pac, comes back almost a year later and beats an old ayala, then gets by morales then beats fana (o wow lol), now peden

[ZABJUDAH#1P4P]

but remember, styles makes fights, so just because barrera beat morales, that doesnt mean that he can convincingly beat pacman, their styles just dont match.

i know im just saying that hes ranked higher because he beat morales, who beat pac, who beat barrera.

its just a lot of different stuff to consider.

[Tha Greatest]

If Tyson would've beat Lewis....

He wouldn't have lost to Holyfield either...

You're basically asking....where would Tyson be if he had some heart...