If beauty contests awards mean more to you than head-2-head match-ups, that's your opinion. You're very wrong, but you're entitled to it. If Mayweather wipes the floor with Pac, he's gonna be historically better. I get the feeling that deep down you feel that's a solid possibility, which is why you're attemping to plant the seed of, "if Pac loses to Money, he's still better."
BTW, why is it that when taking about their respective fights with DLH, the Pacquaio faithful have no problem saying Pac beat him a lot more convincing than Mayweather. Yet, when it comes to JMM, ya'll disregard Mayweather beating him a lot more convincing than Pac. Ya'll say JMM wasn't at his best at WW. But really, do you really think DLH looking like he'd been on a crack diet fighting at a weight he hadn't made in a decade was at his comfor zone? I think those wins cancel each other out. Oh yeah, Mayweather barely beating DLH is a stretch, to say the least. As as close as you want to believe that fight was, Money didn't have nearly as much trouble with DLH as Pac did with JMM.
OH yeah, still no response on the Holyfield question.
BTW, why is it that when taking about their respective fights with DLH, the Pacquaio faithful have no problem saying Pac beat him a lot more convincing than Mayweather. Yet, when it comes to JMM, ya'll disregard Mayweather beating him a lot more convincing than Pac. Ya'll say JMM wasn't at his best at WW. But really, do you really think DLH looking like he'd been on a crack diet fighting at a weight he hadn't made in a decade was at his comfor zone? I think those wins cancel each other out. Oh yeah, Mayweather barely beating DLH is a stretch, to say the least. As as close as you want to believe that fight was, Money didn't have nearly as much trouble with DLH as Pac did with JMM.
OH yeah, still no response on the Holyfield question.
Comment