Who has a better resume Holyfield or Klitschko?

[D-MiZe]

The question was heavyweight resume, don't put De Leon and other cruiserweights on Holyfield's resume.

[the niggest]

Ruiz is such a black mark on that list. Looks so out of place.

Maybe replace with Mercer? Mercer at 34(?) was actually decent.

Yeah I knew I forgot somebody, Holyfield has so many quality wins on his resume it's hard to keep track of them all. Holyfield beat a PRIME Mercer as well... Wlad beat a 40 year old past prime Mercer.

[Steak]

Ruiz is such a black mark on that list. Looks so out of place.

Maybe replace with Mercer? Mercer at 34(?) was actually decent.

that or replace it with Ossie Ocassio, who is one of the better fighter the Cruiserweight division has seen.

The question was heavyweight resume, don't put De Leon and other cruiserweights on Holyfield's resume.

thats a good point.

not really fair otherwise.

[the niggest]

The question was heavyweight resume, don't put De Leon and other cruiserweights on Holyfield's resume.

Eh no, the question was who has the better resume... not who has the better resume at heavyweight.

[WladIsTheChamp]

Why are you so ******ed that you can't separate the two brothers. BTW, if I were to answer your question literally, I would say the Klitschkos, because that's what you asked. Together the Klitschkos are 96-5, which is much better than Holyfields 45-10 record. Now if you were a little more intelligent and asked whether Wlad or Vitaly, I would tell you Wlad has a better resume than Holyfield but Vitaly has a worse total resume than Holyfield, for now. If Holyfield keeps on loosing and Vitaly keeps on winning, that will change.

[D-MiZe]

Eh no, the question was who has the better resume... not who has the better resume at heavyweight.

Go read Tunney's thread title again, son.

[Money Shot]

Why are you so ******ed that you can't separate the two brothers. BTW, if I were to answer your question literally, I would say the Klitschkos, because that's what you asked. Together the Klitschkos are 96-5, which is much better than Holyfields 45-10 record. Now if you were a little more intelligent and asked whether Wlad or Vitaly, I would tell you Wlad has a better resume than Holyfield but Vitaly has a worse total resume than Holyfield, for now. If Holyfield keeps on loosing and Vitaly keeps on winning, that will change.

What won't change is numb nut fa*gots like the OP.

[IronDanHamza]

Holyfield has a better resume than Wlad by a wide margin and has a better resume than Vitali by an absolutly huge margin.

[flat1985]

Why are you so ******ed that you can't separate the two brothers. BTW, if I were to answer your question literally, I would say the Klitschkos, because that's what you asked. Together the Klitschkos are 96-5, which is much better than Holyfields 45-10 record. Now if you were a little more intelligent and asked whether Wlad or Vitaly, I would tell you Wlad has a better resume than Holyfield but Vitaly has a worse total resume than Holyfield, for now. If Holyfield keeps on loosing and Vitaly keeps on winning, that will change.

What a **** post. It is actually impossible for Wlad and Vitali to overcome Holyfields resume.

[the niggest]

Why are you so ******ed that you can't separate the two brothers. BTW, if I were to answer your question literally, I would say the Klitschkos, because that's what you asked. Together the Klitschkos are 96-5, which is much better than Holyfields 45-10 record. Now if you were a little more intelligent and asked whether Wlad or Vitaly, I would tell you Wlad has a better resume than Holyfield but Vitaly has a worse total resume than Holyfield, for now. If Holyfield keeps on loosing and Vitaly keeps on winning, that will change.

Records doesn't mean **** without a good resume... Otherwise Zsolt Erdei, Sven Ottke and JCC Jr would be ATG's.