Who has a better resume Holyfield or Klitschko?

[the niggest]

Go read Tunney's thread title again, son.

This is my thread not Tunneys, son. And I am asking who has the better resume, not who has the better resume at heavyweight.

[Larry the boss]

wlad and vitali have 0 hof's on their resume..0

holyfield has tyson,foreman..both hof's and atg's

[Barry Halls]

This is my thread not Tunneys, son. And I am asking who has the better resume, not who has the better resume at heavyweight.

Like it would matter. Only HW and this is still a landslide.

[flat1985]

LOL at tunney's alts all voting hahahahaha

[Clyde Barrow]

Wlad suffers from a dearth of exceptional challenges. He has annihilated the guys there, which makes his resume pretty good. But he can't touch Evander's resume.

[D-MiZe]

This is my thread not Tunneys, son. And I am asking who has the better resume, not who has the better resume at heavyweight.

Then what is the point in this thread?

It's obvious Holyfield's entire resume dwarfs either Klitschko. It's also obvious this thread has been made because Holyfield was not an option in Tunney's thread.

As BlackIrish said, it wouldn't be fair.

Son.

[WladIsTheChamp]

Records doesn't mean **** without a good resume... Otherwise Zsolt Erdei, Sven Ottke and JCC Jr would be ATG's.

Resume is subjective, records are objective. That's why we keep records of who runs the 100m the fastest and not who LOOKS the fastest. That's why 49-0 is still a hallowed record, that's why Joe Louis and Holmes are still mentioned, records are the most integral thing that we as fans have to judge something objectively without bias.

[ATG Fighter]

Records doesn't mean **** without a good resume... Otherwise Zsolt Erdei, Sven Ottke and JCC Jr would be ATG's.

How dare you? 34 tried and 34 failed. Ottke=ATG

Refer to my sig

[Steak]

Resume is subjective, records are objective. That's why we keep records of who runs the 100m the fastest and not who LOOKS the fastest. That's why 49-0 is still a hallowed record, that's why Joe Louis and Holmes are still mentioned, records are the most integral thing that we as fans have to judge something subjectively without bias.

again.

Then that makes Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. close to being an ATG.

I mean, if Im being objective about it, Jr at 41-0 is better than Holyfield, who has 10 losses.

come on, you dont seriously believe that, do you?

[WladIsTheChamp]

again.

Then that makes Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. close to being an ATG.

I mean, if Im being objective about it, Jr at 41-0 is better than Holyfield, who has 10 losses.

come on, you dont seriously believe that, do you?

You are comparing apples and oranges, two different weight classes. I was just responding to a claim that records mean "nothing". Do you think records mea nothing?