Which of these titleholders are "paper" champions?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
I consider anyone who doesn't hold the ring magazine title as a "paper champion". Vitali Klitschko would have to be added to that list, but I think he has a legitimate claim to being the best in the heavyweight division. The WBC's decision to strip Martinez is a disgrace.Comment
-
Everyone of them other than Ward and Alexander are paper champions only because the best in that division is yet to be determined and though Stieglitz has a belt at 168 he is not in the equation regarding who is the best.
Don't get me started on Shumenov either because he is not even a real paper champion due to the gift he got after the totally schooling Campillo gave him. Campillo is the real WBA paper champ at LHW.Comment
-
Everyone of them other than Ward and Alexander are paper champions only because the best in that division is yet to be determined and though Stieglitz has a belt at 168 he is not in the equation regarding who is the best.
Don't get me started on Shumenov either because he is not even a real paper champion due to the gift he got after the totally schooling Campillo gave him. Campillo is the real WBA paper champ at LHW.Comment
-
Martinez already said he's willing to fight at 154 in another interview. If Pacquiao doesn't want to fight the former holder of the title, he'll continue on being a paper champ.Comment
Comment