Really Can You Belive ONLY 339 Tickets Have Been Sold, For Devon vs Tim?

[The Gambler1981]

so your saying a guy who was actually involved in boxing for 30+ years, who owns a boxing website, who interviews boxers, who knows boxing people, who still to this day is working as a boxing journalist, who is employed by bscene is the same as a flaming poster?

sure buddy old pal.

i can see where this convo is heading. have the last word gambler. you win.

That doesn't mean he really knows anything or that he has good sources or that he has really learned anything in all that time. Because then he would be a credible source, but he is wrong more than right and journalists like that give real journalists a bad name.

I have read him long enough to know there is no reason to give his words any mind, anyone that does is pretty much pissing into the wind.

[The Gambler1981]

The bigger question is why would anyone lie about this, how is it helping anyone to say that the fight has sold less than 500 tickets in a huge stadium? This is one of the few fights that people are getting what they want which is the two best to face each other unlike Haye The Klits Manny & Floyd etc...I don't see how lying about the numbers would help anyone at all in this situation.

Maybe they should cancel and move the fight, it's too good of a fight to let parish in a city that has neither the means nor the economy to back it.

To sound smart if the fight looks empty. Look at what he said my source says this and we will never know the final answer, that is simple way to look good on a fight that was only going to have a limited audience even under the best circumstances.

And since you will never know the final answer he can just pretend to be correct and no one will really care to check because on the surface it will look right.

For a guy that often looks bad, looking good would be an obvious reason.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

That doesn't mean he really knows anything or that he has good sources or that he has really learned anything in all that time. Because then he would be a credible source, but he is wrong more than right and journalists like that give real journalists a bad name.

I have read him long enough to know there is no reason to give his words any mind, anyone that does is pretty much pissing into the wind.

so again,

according to you,

a guy who has been in the game for 30+ years, in the actual game, the boxing game is equal to a douche behind a computer who isnt in the game. cuz that's what your saying.

[Sweet Jesus]

**** it. im from the south. ill bring some paul wall.

i'll bring some slavic flavor

[LUSOB]

Maybe if these boxers start bashing their fathers and family in public, they might get more hits like the loser Nonito Lol

[The Gambler1981]

so again,

according to you,

a guy who has been in the game for 30+ years, in the actual game, the boxing game is equal to a douche behind a computer who isnt in the game. cuz that's what your saying.

I thought you were done?

He hasn't proven to be any better despite all that, I would call that being much worse actually because he should be much better with that background.

According to you he is a viable source, so what~

[warp1432]

so again,

according to you,

a guy who has been in the game for 30+ years, in the actual game, the boxing game is equal to a douche behind a computer who isnt in the game. cuz that's what your saying.

What he is saying is that Michael Marley posts a lot of wrong articles time after time. He often gets misguided information and when he had his own website (Boxing confidential), it was often known as a tabloid site.

[The Gambler1981]

What he is saying is that Michael Marley posts a lot of wrong articles time after time. He often gets misguided information and when he had his own website (Boxing confidential), it was often known as a tabloid site.

Don't bother with him, it isn't worth your time.

If he thinks Marley is a credible source where is this really going to go and I'm down to handle it.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

I thought you were done?

He hasn't proven to be any better despite all that, I would call that being much worse actually because he should be much better with that background.

see, what i predicted is happening now.

again, you compared marley, a man in the game officially for 30+ years as equal to a regular bscene poster.

bye now.

What he is saying is that Michael Marley posts a lot of wrong articles time after time. He often gets misguided information and when he had his own website (Boxing confidential), it was often known as a tabloid site.

everybody gets **** wrong. its boxing. its the most corrupt sport in the world. promoters lying, boxers lying, judges lying. if you covered the sport, chances are you are gonna have some bad info.

the point was he compared marley as equal to a bscene poster.

now he's doing his gambler 101 where he starts arguments & moving the goal posts.

[warp1432]

see, what i predicted is happening now.

again, you compared marley, a man in the game officially for 30+ years as equal to a regular bscene poster.

bye now.



everybody gets **** wrong. its boxing. its the most corrupt sport in the world. promoters lying, boxers lying, judges lying. if you covered the sport, chances are you are gonna have some bad info.

the point was he compared marley as equal to a bscene poster.

now he's doing his gambler 101 where he starts arguments & moving the goal posts.

There's a difference between getting **** wrong and being Michael Marley.