The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Them having Khan #2 doesn't mean he becomes #1 if Devon beats the #1, wtf?

And I like Khan, I believe he may turn out to be the best but I'm withholding judgement on who #2 will be until after January 29th. I will say that a win over Bradley would be better than any on Khan's resume, no?

Alexander beating Bradley wouldnt change the fact he lost to Kotelnik and would have to beat Khan to be considered the no1 in the division. Khan would still have a better resume. Kotelnik and Maidana wins are better than 1 win over Bradley. Bradley is just no1 basically because hes been there longest, hes not "the man".

[RubenSonny]

Alexander beating Bradley wouldnt change the fact he lost to Kotelnik and would have to beat Khan to be considered the no1 in the division. Khan would still have a better resume. Kotelnik and Maidana wins are better than 1 win over Bradley. Bradley is just no1 basically because hes been there longest, hes not "the man".

Win over Corley better than a win over Maidana.

[BirdSong]

Strange one that, no problem with bradley being considered for it alrite but alexander?? First of all 116 - 112 cards across the board v kotelnik were a total joke, devon lost the fight and on top of that he lost to a guy who just lost possibly every round against another contender in the division, khan. How the hell is alexander considered for the ring title?? Madness, oh i remember now, hes american, why not just fix the judges and then let him fight for the award, how convenient

Its bradley v khan for the ring at the moment until one of them loses imo, alexander has done nothing to deserve even consideration

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Strange one that, no problem with bradley being considered for it alrite but alexander?? First of all 116 - 112 cards across the board v kotelnik were a total joke, devon lost the fight and on top of that he lost to a guy who just lost possibly every round against another contender in the division, khan. How the hell is alexander considered for the ring title?? Madness, oh i remember now, hes american, why not just fix the judges and then let him fight for the award, how convenient

Its bradley v khan for the ring at the moment until one of them loses imo, alexander has done nothing to deserve even consideration

Absolutely spot on.

[IronDanHamza]

The winner of this fight Vs Khan should be for that title to be honest.

Maybe thats why there doing it for this fight presuming Khan will fight the winner of this fight.

[IMDAZED]

Alexander beating Bradley wouldnt change the fact he lost to Kotelnik and would have to beat Khan to be considered the no1 in the division. Khan would still have a better resume. Kotelnik and Maidana wins are better than 1 win over Bradley. Bradley is just no1 basically because hes been there longest, hes not "the man".

Yeah it wouldn't change the fact that he beat Bradley either. And who has Khan beaten better than that? Kotelnik and Maidana are better wins than Bradley? Uhh...no.

[IMDAZED]

Win over Corley better than a win over Maidana.

A win over Prescott trumps all.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yeah it wouldn't change the fact that he beat Bradley either. And who has Khan beaten better than that? Kotelnik and Maidana are better wins than Bradley? Uhh...no.

Combined they are. Khan would still have the better resume.

[jaskieee]

Combined they are. Khan would still have the better resume.

No chance. Consider the fights, not only the results. Yeah sure Khan near on shut Kotelnik out but he almost got knocked out by Marcos Maidana and ended up running for the final 3 rounds.

If your going to scrutinise the fashion in which Alexander beat Kotelnik, have a look at how Khan survived Maidana, barely.

[IMDAZED]

Combined they are. Khan would still have the better resume.

Combined? So if I beat 20 mediocre pugs, I'll be better than a person beating one good fighter? It simply doesn't work that way.