The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rocky Rode
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 1396
    • 47
    • 40
    • 7,962

    #161
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    There may have been worse robberies. That doesnt mean it wasnt a robbery.

    Boxingscene did mention it. Read a little closer.
    I know they mentioned it. But it still wasn't a robbery. Boxingscene didn't even say it was a robbery, they just said Kotelnik deserved to win more than 4 rounds, and I agree with that.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #162
      Originally posted by Rocky Rode
      I know they mentioned it. But it still wasn't a robbery. Boxingscene didn't even say it was a robbery, they just said Kotelnik deserved to win more than 4 rounds, and I agree with that.
      Them putting it under "Robberies of the Year" is the giveaway.

      Comment

      • Rocky Rode
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 1396
        • 47
        • 40
        • 7,962

        #163
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Them putting it under "RobberY of the Year" is the giveaway.
        Only it wasn't. It was in "Dis-Honorable Mentions" And all that was said was Kotelnik won more than 4 rounds.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #164
          Originally posted by Rocky Rode
          Only it wasn't. It was in "Dis-Honorable Mentions" And all that was said was Kotelnik won more than 4 rounds.
          Yeah.... dishonourable mentions of other robberies.

          Comment

          • Rocky Rode
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 1396
            • 47
            • 40
            • 7,962

            #165
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            Yeah.... dishonourable mentions of other robberies.
            Or of other close fights that could have gone either way and had scorecards that didn't indicate how close the fight actually was.

            Comment

            • JDezi4
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2010
              • 3822
              • 95
              • 194
              • 10,052

              #166
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              So the no2 guy in the division would have The Ring Belt.

              Yeah you're right, that makes complete sense.
              Lmao, when u have the belt ur the champ. U can look at it like the guy who is #2 guy has the belt (taking into mind Bradley would be considered the #1 guy if he won), but if he beats Khan, than he'd be champ anyway. Again, what's the difference?

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #167
                Originally posted by Rocky Rode
                Or of other close fights that could have gone either way and had scorecards that didn't indicate how close the fight actually was.
                It says robberies mate, read it. Stop arguing and search the polls. You are in the minority who didnt think that was highway robbery.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #168
                  Originally posted by JDezi4
                  Lmao, when u have the belt ur the champ. U can look at it like the guy who is #2 guy has the belt (taking into mind Bradley would be considered the #1 guy if he won), but if he beats Khan, than he'd be champ anyway. Again, what's the difference?
                  The point is The Ring Belt is supposed to be given out when the best 2 guys in the division are fighting. And that is not the case here. How many times do i need to repeat this?

                  Comment

                  • Rocky Rode
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 1396
                    • 47
                    • 40
                    • 7,962

                    #169
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    It says robberies mate, read it. Stop arguing and search the polls. You are in the minority who didnt think that was highway robbery.
                    There's also three very important people that don't think it was.

                    Comment

                    • FloydTBE
                      TBE
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 12561
                      • 461
                      • 204
                      • 23,770

                      #170
                      Originally posted by Rocky Rode
                      Or of other close fights that could have gone either way and had scorecards that didn't indicate how close the fight actually was.
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      It says robberies mate, read it. Stop arguing and search the polls. You are in the minority who didnt think that was highway robbery.
                      Kotelnik did get robbed against alexander. Kotelnik shudve got the decision

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP