The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So if the majority think Alexander lost a close fight that means it was a robbery? I don't have a problem with people who think Kotlenik won, but you want to make it seem as if the fight was one sided when it clearly wasn't.

It was one sided. Like i said, make a thread or search. This was certainly the most high profile robbery of 2010, if not the worst.

[Rocky Rode]

It was one sided. Like i said, make a thread or search. This was certainly the most high profile robbery of 2010, if not the worst.

ESPN didn't have it in it's top 5 robberies of the year. Hell, no major boxing outlet had it as robbery of the year. You're just a hater.

[JDezi4]

Ifs and buts. Bottom line is that this fight should not be for the Ring belt

Lmao nice dodge

So Alexander beats Bradley, he becomes #1 in the division, and thus qualifies to fight for the Ring belt

Bradley beats Alexander, he more than qualifies to fight for the ring belt.

Considering Khan isn't fighting either of them for a long while, why can't the number 1 guy in the division be named champ?

Please don't avoid this question

[Dirk Diggler UK]

ESPN didn't have it in it's top 5 robberies of the year. Hell, no major boxing outlet had it as robbery of the year. You're just a hater.

A hater of who? Alexander? Lol...man i dont care about him enough to hate him. "Hater" is the gayest phrase ever used, its used as a cop out when you're struggling in a debate.

What were ESPN's 5 robberies? I didnt know such a thing existed

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lmao nice dodge

So Alexander beats Bradley, he becomes #1 in the division, and thus qualifies to fight for the Ring belt

Bradley beats Alexander, he more than qualifies to fight for the ring belt.

Considering Khan isn't fighting either of them for a long while, why can't the number 1 guy in the division be named champ?

Please don't avoid this question

Because they havent beaten Khan...its pretty simple. If Alexander beats Bradley, then Khan is the no1 in the division.

[Rocky Rode]

A hater of who? Alexander? Lol...man i dont care about him enough to hate him. "Hater" is the gayest phrase ever used, its used as a cop out when you're struggling in a debate.

What were ESPN's 5 robberies? I didnt know such a thing existed

Well, it was was 4

Robbery of the year: There are debatable, controversial decisions every year. But there's a difference between a close fight that causes disagreement and an outright theft. The most obscene theft of 2010 came in the light heavyweight title rematch between Beibut Shumenov and Gabriel Campillo. In 2009, Campillo took a majority decision against Shumenov in Shumenov's native Kazakhstan to retain his title on a very close call. In the rematch last January, which took place in Shumenov's adopted hometown of Las Vegas, Campillo got utterly ripped off in a split decision. Judge Levi Martinez had it 117-111 for Campillo, which seemed appropriate. I thought Campillo dominated while busting up Shumenov and coming close to a stoppage. I have yet to find anyone who agreed with the two judges who scored it for Shumenov, Patricia Morse Jarman (117-111) and Jerry Roth (115-113).

http://espn.go.com/sports/boxing/blog/_/name/rafael_dan/id/5987225/keeping-2010-boxing-awards-coming

And Boxingscene didn't choose it as robbery of the year.

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=34197

[Ray*]

Depends who wins, Bradley wins he more than deserve it.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well, it was was 4

http://espn.go.com/sports/boxing/blog/_/name/rafael_dan/id/5987225/keeping-2010-boxing-awards-coming

And Boxingscene didn't choose it as robbery of the year.

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=34197

There may have been worse robberies. That doesnt mean it wasnt a robbery.

Boxingscene did mention it. Read a little closer.

[JDezi4]

Because they havent beaten Khan...its pretty simple. If Alexander beats Bradley, then Khan is the no1 in the division.

And who will this hypothetical #1 contender that is Amir Khan fight for the Ring title? The # 2 contender, which would be Alexander. So in the end Khan would be fighting Alexander for the title. Or he would be fight Bradley for the title. Does it really matter that one of them actually owns the titl when he fights them for it?

NO it doesn't

[Dirk Diggler UK]

And who will this hypothetical #1 contender that is Amir Khan fight for the Ring title? The # 2 contender, which would be Alexander. So in the end Khan would be fighting Alexander for the title. Or he would be fight Bradley for the title. Does it really matter that one of them actually owns the titl when he fights them for it?

NO it doesn't

So the no2 guy in the division would have The Ring Belt.

Yeah you're right, that makes complete sense.