Why the **** should Haye fight Chagaev?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
But without them you are fucked. As a boxer, or as a citizen. Same goes for David Haye, if he is not to defend his title or unify it, he puts himself outside to scope of use and trust of the organization which he represents. Its only an exile then.Comment
-
someone like a prime rahman, a prime tua, hell even corrie sanders was decent
those fighters would beat chambers, sam peter, tony thompson and calvin brock up
these fat full time burger king customers arent what panda considers fighters with a pulse
ibragimov was decent though but wlad fought him like a scared little girl with a stickComment
-
Location: East London
Opinion: Invalid
He's certainly fought tougher opponents than David Haye, that's for certain. Haye is all talk. Don't let your foolish British pride get in the way of realizing this. He's a fraud. And if he wasn't a fraud, he wouldn't have fought Audley Harrisson in his last fight. If he couldn't make the the fight with Wlad or Vitali, why not go after Adamek? Oh, I know why: Because Adamek would kick his ass! Which is why the Klitshcko are going after Adamek, because he's the next best possible opposition. Haye will probably go on to fight someone along the lines of Tye Fields in his next fight. Assuming of course that he doesn't have to fight Chagaev, who could potentially give him problems. Haye is a coward. And like I said, he will be exposed soon enough. (Unless of course he retires, which wouldn't surprise me in the slightest, because he really is THAT MUCH OF A COWARD.)Comment
-
Comment
-
Please. Wlad has problems with lefties. He didn't want the fight to become Corrie Sanders version 2.0. He fought cautiously, yes. But he won, in a complete shutout. I fail to see what's wrong with that. You're just a hater.Comment
Comment