Tweet
Tito is was the better fighter because of his size,stamina & power.Cotto has more skill technically,but he's smaller & not as tough.
-
-
I think Trinidad is much more popular, but that Cotto is the better boxer.
I also prefer from a personal standpoint, Cotto's silent warrior demeanor. Trinidad always seemed to be that flashy type of Puerto Rican, who's greatly proud of his heritage and I imagine that he d****s a mini flag off his rear view mirror.
I am not like that, so if I had to choose one, over personality, I'd favor Cotto.
If they were to ever fight, in their primes, I would choose Cotto, as long as he can stay out of range of them left hooksComment
-
i love them the same. tito and cotto have different styles but i love them both. 1 was more of a warrior then the other. cotto is better boxer 4sure.Comment
-
I don't even think this is debatable.Comment
-
Maybe not to you? But who are you anyways? Are you like the expert around here? GTFOHOriginally posted by jrosales13 View PostComment
-
Well considering I said "I" as in me. I would say yes you're right not to me. Good observation there bro.Originally posted by el20cuatro View PostComment
-
Cotto's the better boxer, Trinidad's would win.
Trinidad's more beloved becuz he was very actively involved with his fellow PR's.Comment
-
Your just a clown!! You think you are like some sorth of Central American expert on boxing!! Maybe you should apply to work bor Boxingscene.com as a boxing journalist, Nah maybe go and work for HBO as a commentator Homie!! You'll stand out over there just like you do here right?Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostComment
-
Trinidad was better and preferred to the PR people.
I much prefer Cotto....couldn't really stand Tito's personality to be honest. But he was dynamite in the ring.Comment
-
I am not even sure if Cotto is the better boxer,
And, Cotto got hit a lot more so than Tito did IMO.
And, I don't even think Cotto chin was as Tito chin either.Comment
Comment