Who would have won Prime Prince Naseem Vs The Barrera That Beat Him

[MXboxingfan]

There's never any in-between with Naseem Hamed.You have his fans,who would have you believe that he was years past his prime and would have beaten any fighter at his absolute best,then you have the Americans and Mexicans - who will dismiss Hamed's opposition outside of Barrera due to their own ignorance and ******ity of the sport at that time.



Hamed is still,without question,the greatest featherweight of the 1990's.The greatest and most accomplished fighter of his own division over ten years - not bad

You dismiss Barrera's win over Hamed because he is not a British ******.

[big paulie]

If you think Morales was 'too fragile' you should revisit his first fights with Barrera and Pac. What im trying to get across is that it was the same Naz in with Barrera he just didnt look good coz Barrera was just too good, he wouldnt let him look good, kept his left foot outside Hameds right foot all night long and was just technically too good. Barrera read everything so well that night and got hit cleanly with what, 1 or 2 power shots that had zero affect, made Naz look like an amatuer.

[MXboxingfan]

How did hamed fight bums? he fought all the title holders in his weight division and was really undisputed featherweight kevin kelley was 47-1,Remigio Daniel Molina 27-0,Tom Johnson ibf beltholder,Wilfredo Vazquez the name jus says it all, Wayne McCullough, Paul Ingle 21-0,Cesar Soto, Vuyani Bungu hadent been beat in 8years and naz koed him , Augie Sanchez 26-1

and erik morales and barrera beat a shot version of kelley afta naseem koed him

Naseem was calling out barrera and morales for years but they wouldnt move up and barrera timed his move right and was the better man on the night

Hamed fought Augie Sanchez after Sanchez had already been knocked out in 1 round by a journeyman named Edgar Garcia.

Again, Augie Sanchez was a jourrney man. I really don't understand why you give Hamed so much credit for that win.

[deuce_drop]

Barrera would still have done it.

Superior style.

end of thread/

[qari]

augie won 10 fights after that 1 loss 9 by ko m8 he beat floyd mayweather that says it all m8 end of he was no bum cuz hbo wouldnt hav accepted the fyt

[deuce_drop]

Hamed fought Augie Sanchez after Sanchez had already been knocked out in 1 round by a journeyman named Edgar Garcia.

Again, Augie Sanchez was a jourrney man. I really don't understand why you give Hamed so much credit for that win.

not to forget, sanchez was still giving hamed fits up until hamed pulled a classic " hit on a clean break" that rocked augie and he was out on his feet after that.

i was training in augies gym at that time and he was setup like a prize pig if you ask me.

anywho, sanchez was a prime example of how warren would build up hamed and the rest of his fighters. he was a chinny guy with a decent punch, decent looking record, and wasn't ready for that kind of fight yet....


anyway you slice it, hamed was exposed as a fraud after fighting barrera, because he quit after one loss. he had the fighter beaten out of him by barrera.

if hamed was any bit of a real champ and boxer he would've made it back to the top to rule, which is nothing close to what he did.

he got boo'd out the ring by his hometown crowd and never stepped back into the ring again as a fighter.................. something a great DOES NOT DO.

[qari]

dude he had 1 fyt after that agaisnt eroupean champion he didnt hav it in him he lost 2 late in his career and yh i agree that was a bich way owt

[Chew BackAtacha]

not to forget, sanchez was still giving hamed fits up until hamed pulled a classic " hit on a clean break" that rocked augie and he was out on his feet after that.

i was training in augies gym at that time and he was setup like a prize pig if you ask me.

anywho, sanchez was a prime example of how warren would build up hamed and the rest of his fighters. he was a chinny guy with a decent punch, decent looking record, and wasn't ready for that kind of fight yet....


.

he wasnt with warren for that fight. but hey, dont let facts get in the way of your agenda

[deuce_drop]

he wasnt with warren for that fight. but hey, dont let facts get in the way of your agenda

true, forgot about that, but the model was set, it was the same match making ideals. either way, i for the life of me can not accept hamed as a great, although his achievements are REALLY good, i just don't hold the sentiment that he is great based solely on what he did after his first loss......

and it seems that after hamed split up with warren, he had his toughest fights, minus sanchez, even though augie put him on the canvas....

[PacquiaoATG]

Barrera will beat any Naseem version.