Who would have won Prime Prince Naseem Vs The Barrera That Beat Him

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bruzza
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 259
    • 9
    • 4
    • 6,329

    #51
    Originally posted by PrinceNaz88
    On the rise???

    LMFAO

    He had barely trained for the Barrera fight.

    In my opinion he would of stopped Barrera when he was at his best with Ingle between 95-98. Barrera was a terrific fighter though so would still have been a big test.
    And that was barreras fault he didn't train? Riiiiight!!!

    Comment

    • Schmerzen
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 2554
      • 121
      • 146
      • 10,313

      #52
      the prince was an exciting fighter, but he was never mean enough to beat someone like barrera.

      Comment

      • prinzemanspopa
        queenmanspopa
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 2714
        • 356
        • 207
        • 9,287

        #53
        There's never any in-between with Naseem Hamed.You have his fans,who would have you believe that he was years past his prime and would have beaten any fighter at his absolute best,then you have the Americans and Mexicans - who will dismiss Hamed's opposition outside of Barrera due to their own ignorance and ******ity of the sport at that time.



        Hamed is still,without question,the greatest featherweight of the 1990's.The greatest and most accomplished fighter of his own division over ten years - not bad
        Last edited by prinzemanspopa; 01-01-2011, 08:50 AM.

        Comment

        • studentofthegam
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 4127
          • 114
          • 107
          • 4,433

          #54
          Originally posted by qari
          Dude how can i be racist when i rank erik morales as 1 of the best ever? i scored the fights and had him beat barrera all 3 times imo the knockdown didnt count cuz it wasnt a punch

          Prince naseem had some raw power comeon u cant deny if they were havin a slugfest naz would win each time and when he was with ingle he could actually box but when he left him he jusr relied on power cause he thought he was invincible but no1 is not even mayweather and btw augie beat floyd in the amateurs so you cant say hes a bum

          barrera outboxed prince and made him look silly i agree but if they fought when prince was with ingle naz wins by late ko/tko

          Look at the size differrence between augie and prince comeon he looked like a super lightweiight vs featherweight
          Are you drunk. You are really reaching to bring up Augie Sanchez. He may have been a decent amateur but he was a professional punching bag. And what is this "if" stuff. " If they had a slug fest?" , If water wasnt liquid we couldnt drink it, If it didnt get cold it wouldnt snow, If Hamed weighed 240 he would be a heavyweight, And if Barrera only had one arm,lol, He would still win a close decision. Come on baby boi dont force your point like that.

          Comment

          • lfc19titles
            Undisputed Champion
            • Mar 2010
            • 8731
            • 725
            • 628
            • 94,838

            #55
            naz did not train well at all for the barrera fight, i sould say he was at around 85 percent to his best in that fight, i think it would have been close but naz would have won it by ko

            Comment

            • acdc
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Sep 2010
              • 883
              • 51
              • 10
              • 1,178

              #56

              Comment

              • studentofthegam
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 4127
                • 114
                • 107
                • 4,433

                #57
                Originally posted by lfc19titles
                naz did not train well at all for the barrera fight, i sould say he was at around 85 percent to his best in that fight, i think it would have been close but naz would have won it by ko
                When did a fighters lack of training disqualify an ass whippin? It wouldnt be an acceptable excuse for Mayweather or Pac or Klitsko under any circumstances short of death so Why do you all get to decide he deserves a pass for being irresponsible and lazy. When a person does not execute prior to or during the fight its a fair and square beating with no need for "If".

                Comment

                • Chew BackAtacha
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 669
                  • 26
                  • 2
                  • 6,888

                  #58
                  in defence of the thread starter

                  the hamed that won the world championship at 21 was a much better fighter tha the one who lost to Barrera. That Hamed, like Mike Tysonn before him, started to think he could k.o everyone and neglected training. A tragedy, but the way Hamed leaped in with his punches meant a decent counter puncher would have a very good chance of beating him. Marquez would absolutley kill him.

                  You need to remember that Barrera completlye changed his style for this fight. NO offence, but Barrera was very un-mexican in this fight, he just refused to engage, like a puto. Hamed was surprised - I was surprised - but looking back, he did the right thing.

                  As for Augie Sanchez, maybe im showing my age, but he was meant to be the next best thing. HE was the last person to beat floyd Mayweather - people forget that. Hamed ruined him.

                  Comment

                  • studentofthegam
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 4127
                    • 114
                    • 107
                    • 4,433

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Chew BackAtacha
                    in defence of the thread starter

                    the hamed that won the world championship at 21 was a much better fighter tha the one who lost to Barrera. That Hamed, like Mike Tysonn before him, started to think he could k.o everyone and neglected training. A tragedy, but the way Hamed leaped in with his punches meant a decent counter puncher would have a very good chance of beating him. Marquez would absolutley kill him.

                    You need to remember that Barrera completlye changed his style for this fight. NO offence, but Barrera was very un-mexican in this fight, he just refused to engage, like a puto. Hamed was surprised - I was surprised - but looking back, he did the right thing.

                    As for Augie Sanchez, maybe im showing my age, but he was meant to be the next best thing. HE was the last person to beat floyd Mayweather - people forget that. Hamed ruined him.
                    Now why did you put your ass on that fire like that? Hamed was 27 yrs old when he fought MAB. Past his prime just sounds ******. You got on here and agreed with every point he made. You sound just as silly. Hamed always fought the same, with his hands down and jumping in. Barrera fought the same too. He punked him and roughed him up a little. Thats when you saw Naseem lose faith in his self. What the hell is un-Mexican? The fact that you used the term made it irreversably offensive so dont hide behind "no offense". Lastly, Yall have to be embarrassed to keep talking about ol' Augie. Besides he wasnt the last person to beat Mayweather. Yall must be drinking together.

                    Comment

                    • nelsoncm
                      i'm proud to be gay
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 1846
                      • 54
                      • 0
                      • 9,819

                      #60
                      No he wouldn't beat Barrera on his best day.

                      And please stop with the theory of a fighter losing because he's not in his prime.

                      Naz was never mentally strong. Goes the same with a lot of fighters.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP