Originally posted by infamous larryx
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
wHAT DID hOPKINS DO TO NOT LOOK OLD AFTER cALZAGHE?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JoeyZagz View PostEasy answer is that Calzaghe makes everyone look bad.
Bika, Hopkins and Kessler all looked bad.....
Ward strggles with Bika
Pascal struggles with Hopkins
Froch struggles with Kessler
I think its time we all gave zags some freakin credit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JoeyZagz View PostEasy answer is that Calzaghe makes everyone look bad.
Bika, Hopkins and Kessler all looked bad.....
Ward strggles with Bika
Pascal struggles with Hopkins
Froch struggles with Kessler
I think its time we all gave zags some freakin credit.
Comment
-
He looked old against Jones too, let's not forget.
But really, it's simple. It's about styles and Hopkins strategy for the fight.
Against Calzaghe, Hopkins stated before and after the fight his plan was to take away Joe's number 1 weapon, which is his work-rate. How does one do this? By smothering him, by clinching, by getting inside, by making it an ugly fight. This is how you attempt to cut down your opponents punch out put in half.
Against Pascal, he didn't need to smother him because Pascal doesn't throw many punches - Pascal fights in bursts. This allowed Hopkins to be the aggressor and allowed Hopkins to fight a different kind of fight, which is why Hopkins rarely clinched at all.
If he fought that way against Calzaghe, he wouldn't have had a chance to win. Even though it was ugly, his game plan was correct at his age. There is no way a 43 year old could match 100 punches per round, so what he did was totally legit, even though it made him (and Calzaghe) look like **** in the process to the naked eye, he nearly walked away with the win.
It was a similar case for Winky Wright. Winky's best weapon was his jab, one of the best in the game. One of the best ways to take away the jab is to smother the opponent and get inside, which is exactly what hopkins did. Again, it looks ugly, but it's effective.Last edited by ИATAS; 12-29-2010, 02:50 PM.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostHe looked old against Jones too, let's not forget.
But really, it's simple. It's about styles and Hopkins strategy for the fight.
Against Calzaghe, Hopkins stated before and after the fight his plan was to take away Joe's number 1 weapon, which is his work-rate. How does one do this? By smothering him, by clinching, by getting inside, by making it an ugly fight. This is how you attempt to cut down your opponents punch out put in half.
Against Pascal, he didn't need to smother him because Pascal doesn't throw many punches - Pascal fights in bursts. This allowed Hopkins to be the aggressor and allowed Hopkins to fight a different kind of fight, which is why Hopkins rarely clinched at all.
If he fought that way against Calzaghe, he wouldn't have had a chance to win. Even though it was ugly, his game plan was correct at his age. There is no way a 43 year old could match 100 punches per round, so what he did was totally legit, even though it made him (and Calzaghe) look like **** in the process to the naked eye, he nearly walked away with the win.
It was a similar case for Winky Wright. Winky's best weapon was his jab, one of the best in the game. One of the best ways to take away the jab is to smother the opponent and get inside, which is exactly what hopkins did. Again, it looks ugly, but it's effective.
Comment
-
-
Comment