Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Double Standard? Hopkins Praised, Pacquiao Smeared

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Hopkins is 45 years old you moron!, how are going to start comparing what Hopkins did to Pascal at 45, to what Pacquiao is doing and HE"S ON HIS PRIME AND IS ALREADY TALKING ABOUT RETIREMENT IN 3 OR SO FIGHTS!. I'll tell you one thing. If SOMEONE COULD GIVE HOPKINS EVEN 15-20 YEARS BACK OF HIS TIME, HE'D BE FIGHTING THE BEST AND NOT WASTING HIS OR ANYONE ELSE'S TIME

    Comment


    • #92
      Fat Marley? GTFO. This guy is horrible. Hopkins doesn't deserve to get praised? He's 45 years old and he fought the young champion, Pascal had so much hype around him(even though I think he's a bum), people said he would be the next Roy Jones Jr. Hopkins destroyed him. Hopkins isn't in there fighting George Foreman. He destroyed a young, hungry champion. Hopkins WAS the damn UNDERDOG in the fight.

      Pacquiao is considered the best p4p fighter in the sport and he's fighting a 40 year old man coming off a draw and a lost.

      How is this a double standard? Marley, just quit your job.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
        If SOMEONE COULD GIVE HOPKINS EVEN 15-20 YEARS BACK OF HIS TIME, HE'D BE FIGHTING THE BEST AND NOT WASTING HIS OR ANYONE ELSE'S TIME
        you mean like how hopkins didn't fight rjj when both were p4p #1 and #2?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by hitking View Post
          Roy Jones dominated the light heavyweight division and beat a top fleight heavyweight. And most of the years he spent doing that, he could have easily fought as a supermiddleweight and maybe a middleweight. I don't ever recall his ass being kissed the way Pac's is for fighting bigger guys. Hell, he was actually criticized, much the way Mayweather is now, towards the end if his reign as P4P King for not fighting the best competition. Pac isn't doing anything RJ didn't, and he's not nearly as dominate. So your stance really doesn't hold much water.
          Simple, RJ kept fighting and his losses diminished his achievements. Look at Lennox, he retired on top. That's what people will remember him as ON TOP when he left the game.... Roy Jones Jr didn't so his losses taint his successes. It may not be fair but life isn't always fair.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Elotero View Post
            i will go in with you.

            On a side note about the article, to the author, why the pass for Hopkins and not for Marquez? Hops gets KD early in the fight and goes on to win every single round after. You say he should have won and was cheated. What about PAc/JMM 1 and 2? Same exact circumstances you Manny nuthugger. How come you dont put that in your article?
            good point brought up about B-hop and JMM comparison. but all we need to do to get that answer is look at the article writer. absolute garbage what is written by him time and time again this is just an absolutely ****** article which goes to show the level of boxing knowledge this guy has and that is ZERO knowledge a Manny nuthugger he is. idk how this is even posted up on this website

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by HyperUppercut View Post
              because he refused the drug tests. thats why I think pac is on "da shyt". I know hopkins would take that test in a heart beat for 40 million. It ain't no double standard, pac made himself look like a dammn cheat.
              hell ill go even deeper for you, 150% of the people who post on this site defending pacs decision to not take the test, would actually take the random test for $5000.00 with no cut off dates

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by | THE KING | View Post
                Some do know about the lower classes that established him as a legend.. Barrera Marquez Morales.. and championship fights prior to that.
                some... just a few though

                Comment


                • #98
                  So Michael Marley starts the article by claiming he's a B-hop fan...then goes on about how B-hop should be the one being question about PEDS and not Pac...then he blabs about how Mosley was never a suspect the same way B-hop ain't suspect...so the translation is...why question Pac? B-hop should be the one being questioned...what a pathetic cheap shot against a 46 year old living legend!

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                    bwahahahahahaha!

                    look at all the *****s getting mad.
                    i know the term ***** would come up sooner or later

                    Comment


                    • This is not even remotely close .. Hopkins is not KOing his opponents and has the same steady work rate that he has always had.. Pac on the other hand has moved up in wight and has been able to increase his work rate as well as his power, which has never been done in boxing ever!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP