Carl Froch > Bernard Hopkins P4P

[SOPH~ REP.]

Froch lost to pascal/dirrill in my eyes

[Earl-Hickey]

Pascal was green when he fought Froch and he lost in a shady UK style decision like Dirrell did.

Hopkins fought a prime Pascal coming off a great win against Chad Dawson. Hopkins was a massve underdog.

Hopkins at 45 years old, was given one unfair knockdown and one fair knockdown, he was able to rally and beat and dominate Pascal from round 4 and onwards, it was truly a boxing master display

Froch best wins are Dirrell and Pascal, two questionable home town decisions

Hopkins > Froch

I was waiting for someone to say Pascal was green.

Yeah lol, and in his next 4 fights he goes unbeaten and beats diaconu twice and then dawson.

If Pascall didnt do **** all for 2 years then had those wins you might be right, but he IMMIDIATLEY went up and unified 175 lol.

And a shady win?

wtf?

[Who are you?]

Actually it was not a shady win at all.

I do agree that Froch/Dirrell could have been a draw.

Froch/Pascal, on the other hand, was a correct decision and it was not a shady result at all. Pascal got the worse in that fight.

[Flawless*]

I was waiting for someone to say Pascal was green.

Yeah lol, and in his next 4 fights he goes unbeaten and beats diaconu twice and then dawson.

If Pascall didnt do **** all for 2 years then had those wins you might be right, but he IMMIDIATLEY went up and unified 175 lol.

And a shady win?

wtf?

Doesn’t change the fact he was green when he fought Froch, the Pascal that fought Dawson and Hopkins was and still much better than the 168 Pascal, that Froch Home decisioned

[-Lowkey-]

For those who are saying Froch beat a green version of Pascal id just like to point out the obvious BOTH boxers where in there First world title fight Pascal came in as 21-0 having boxed 132 pro rounds. Froch came in 23-0 having boxed 139 pro rounds.

Hardly a vast gap between the fighters in terms of pro experience so you can give up using that lame excuse. And i dont know how anyone could of given the Froch Pascal fight to Pascal.

And yes i agree with the TS Froch should be P4P

[Flawless*]

Actually it was not a shady win at all.

I do agree that Froch/Dirrell could have been a draw.

Froch/Pascal, on the other hand, was a correct decision and it was not a shady result at all. Pascal got the worse in that fight.

Anyone with a clear mind would tell you Dirrell easily won that fight, anywhere else in the World Dirrell would have won comfortably

117-110, and 116-111 scorecards were ridiculous, Pascal was never going to win in the UK,

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Anyone with a clear mind would tell you Dirrell easily won that fight, anywhere else in the World Dirrell would have won comfortably

117-110, and 116-111 scorecards were ridiculous, Pascal was never going to win in the UK,

Especially when he clearly loses a fight. Shocking isnt it

[Who are you?]

Froch beat Pascal up.

There was no one pressrow, or anyone of note at all that gave the fight to Pascal. Everyone is in agreement that Froch won, by quite a margin to, about 8 rounds to 4.

I do agree that Froch/Dirrell was much closer, and I feel a draw perhaps would have been best for that fight.

[-Lowkey-]

Doesn’t change the fact he was green when he fought Froch, the Pascal that fought Dawson and Hopkins was and still much better than the 168 Pascal, that Froch Home decisioned

Froch had boxed a mere 7 more pro rounds than Pascal going into that fight both have improved since and it was hardy a home decision nice try tho.

[Flawless*]

Froch had boxed a mere 7 more pro rounds than Pascal going into that fight both have improved since and it was hardy a home decision nice try tho.

117-110, and 116-111 scorecards

These scorecards indicate that the judges clearly didn't score the fight properly and never gave Pascal a chance, a clear home town decision