Carl Froch > Bernard Hopkins P4P

[Who are you?]

Carl Froch is a better fighter and should be P4P rated above both Jean Pascal and Bernard Hopkins due to his wins over Pascal, Dirrell, and Abraham.

Carl Froch W 12 Jean Pascal > Bernard Hopkins D 12 Jean Pascal

Just thought I'd point that out.

Rationally speaking, Froch *must* be rated above both BHOP and Pascal. And considering Chad Dawson was rated by some a top5 P4P.

It would seem rational to have Carl Froch somewhere in the middle of a top10 P4P list.

I am not even a Carl Froch fan. Just pointing out the ignorance in some people hyping up Hopkins VS Pascal (it wasnt even a win, and besides, Froch beat Pascal wayyy worse)

[mines a pasty]

Carl Froch has done more in the past 2 years than that chump Hopkins has done in his whole boring career

[prinzemanspopa]

Thing is,Carl Froch has no talent.Unlike Hopkins,who thoroughly dominated Pascal,Carl Froch was forced to go life and death with him - and Pascal will still relatively green on the world stage at that point.



And why does Carla get extra brownie points for losing a clear decision to Andre Dirrell? Hopkins hasn't been beaten decisively in over seventeen years

[Rick Grimes]

Thing is,Carl Froch has no talent.Unlike Hopkins,who thoroughly dominated Pascal,Carl Froch was forced to go life and death with him - and Pascal will still relatively green on the world stage at that point.



And why does Carla get extra brownie points for losing a clear decision to Andre Dirrell? Hopkins hasn't been beaten decisively in over seventeen years

Getting knocked down twice and having a very close fight (even if you thought he won it was close) is not dominating. Sorry.

[Hitman Hodgson]

Carl Froch has done more in the past 2 years than that chump Hopkins has done in his whole boring career

I'm a Froch fan but thats BS.

[1believer]

yea i agree he should be in the p4p rankings he has fought and beat top opposition in succession , i just checked and they have juan ma lopez at number 10.....

[prinzemanspopa]

Getting knocked down twice and having a very close fight (even if you thought he won it was close) is not dominating. Sorry.

That's because you're too ****** to know any better.You have your lips firmly sealed around the **** of virtually every single active British boxer around.



Hopkins out-boxed,out-fought and out-worked the inferior Jean Pascal to take home what should have been a clear,decisive decision,regardless of the two knockdowns.

[Rick Grimes]

That's because you're too ****** to know any better.You have your lips firmly sealed around the **** of virtually every single active British boxer around.



Hopkins out-boxed,out-fought and out-worked the inferior Jean Pascal to take home what should have been a clear,decisive decision,regardless of the two knockdowns.

No he didn't, Hopkins himself agreed he was 5 points behind after 3 rounds. If you gave him all 9 rounds after that it still would be a close fight.

[Weebler I]

Hopkins out-boxed,out-fought and out-worked the inferior Jean Pascal to take home what should have been a clear,decisive decision,regardless of the two knockdowns.

I honestly don't care who is higher on the pfp list, but Hopkins/Pascal was a close fight and it was no surprise it was judged a draw.

[ATG Fighter]

Carl Froch has done more in the past 2 years than that chump Hopkins has done in his whole boring career