Comments Thread For: Schaefer is 1000% Right on Bernard Hopkins Ripoff

[mushahadeen]

ummm how is that comment worthy of a green k???

Don't be a hater.

[Mr Reality]

Hopkins won every round from 5 to 12 and controlled the fight going down the strech. Terrible decision. Close fight scoring wise due to the Knockdowns (Hopkins wasn't really seriously hurt), but easy to judge... I had it 114-112.

The scoring cheated history, as Hopkins would have been the oldest fighter to win a Championship Belt.

[OnePunch]

Hopkins won every round from 5 to 12 and controlled the fight going down the strech. Terrible decision. Close fight scoring wise due to the Knockdowns (Hopkins wasn't really seriously hurt), but easy to judge... I had it 114-112.

The scoring cheated history, as Hopkins would have been the oldest fighter to win a Championship Belt.

so a judge disagreeing with you by ONE ROUND makes it a terrible decision??? lol

[Mzembe]

Robbery or NOT

Hey,
Felix Sturm beat Oscar and he got robbed.
Sergio Martinez beat PW in the first fight and got Robbed.
Sergio Martinez beat Cintron and got robbed.
Ali Funeka beat Guzman and got robbed.
Do you see what the connection is between these fighters who got robbed? They are all foreigners who came to America and got robbed.

So quit whining about Hopkins and move on. If Hopkins is really the man, why did he refuse to fight Chad Dawson?
Hopkins is a punk and used to **** men when he was in prison.

[GOD-FR33]

The two knock downs made the difference.......

Just as I thought. A bunch of back lash about a decision where a fighter went down twice. The hardest thing to do in the ring is knock your opponent down or out. PASCAL managed to do that and remained in the fight the rest of the way. At no point during the fight did HOPKINS dominate this young man. STATISTICALLY, HOPKINS would have had do dominate every round after the third to even get a draw. Did he honetsly do that? No he didn't. PASCAL caught him with the cleaner more effective shots most of the fight. Very sneaky clean shots and that was the difference aside of the knock downs. HOPKINS fought gamed but he is OLD guys. Since when have you seen him repeatedly get hit with clean shots like that? He's lucky he wasn't K.O.ed to be honest. Who is he going to beat? PASCAL will win the rematch IF they fight again. I think you guys are more impressed with a 45 year old fighter going the distance with a champion, and that's what HOPKINS and RICHARD are impressed with as well. All he had to do is make it to the final bell, and he would claim victory just like he did. Talking about he "BEAT PASCAL UP". GET REAL MAN! It was a close fight but give the young man credit for staying clam and poised and being smart in there. HOPKINS didn't want to fight DAWSON because of his size and hand-speed I think. He knows he would get beat up so since PASCAL pulled off the upset, he thinks by beating PASCAL, he beat DAWSON as well. I DON'T THINK SO! PASCAL is not even a B-LEVEL fighter but he did what he had to do last night. Stop being biased all the time because of a fighters name, and what they was. HOPKINS is not what he use to be and should retire immediately.

[GOD-FR33]

Exactly.......

GOOD POST HERE! I agree. Read mines!

[sfshralp]

When pascal knocked hopkins down in the first round it was an illegal punch to the back of the head. hopkins won this fight.

[Buthopvlick]

A slap in the face for canada's boxing credibility...

[wheezybaby87]

i had pascal only winning 4 of the scheduled 12 rounds, after the first four rounds he started fading and lettin hopkins outwork him i gave hopkins a close decision, the draw sucks but its justified by the knockdowns still i don't see a decision in pascals favor

[NECK SNAPPER]

hopkins is the man forget the scoring. boxing is the worst sport in getting it right. but its really in trouble when the undisputed lt hvy champ gets takin
for a ride buy a 46yr old former middle wt champ. whats the punch stat
wit that.