Hopkins dictaded the fight after round 3, he made Pascal frustruated, looked in better shape, had the bettrer ring generalship, he did everythin right after the knockdowns. If it werent for that bogus knockdown in the 1st, we would all be recognizing and proud to see Hopkins as the oldest man to win a title. ****in judges wrecked a historic night. Pascal better rematch him, and take another ass whoopin out of respect !
Who Won - Bernard Hopkins OR Jean Pascal?
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Watch the faces of the fighters after the fight. They knew who won. Hopkins was thrilled and Pascal looked like a fighter who had just been ****d in his own backyard. When Jim Grey asked Pascal how he could possibly think that he won, he had no answer. He was out landed, and just plain schooled.
Comment
-
u are so ****ing ******ed its insane..
Go back to sucking floyds **** u ****ing bastard, or oh... wait.. Its Pacquiaos **** that tastes best now.
Twofaced ******.Comment
-
Comment
-
I have seen the scorecards and what stands out is Van de Weile has a 10-10 round in the 10th round.Don't they have to judge the tenth round as a winner,not a draw in this fight? If so,the other judges both have Hopkins winning the tenth,so you would have to assume that even with the wretched judging,Hopkins should still have won by at least a SD.Keep in mind that The this is the same judge who scored the fight for Froch against Dirrell-this punk has always given it as close to the hometown guy as he can-the problem is,he could only find a way to make it a draw based on a 10-10 round (ironically in the 10th round).Comment
-
Comment