Weight drained, shot, damaged good? How?

[White Briton]

How much does Top Rank pay you guys to do this?

Take it easy. Guy probably watches on a 10 inch black and white. HAHAHA!

[MtClimber]

2.) Joshua Clottey
A slow, plodding, hardworking but very limited boxer who was outboxed by damaged goods in Cotto and the real Margarito.

So is Clottey a shot, weight-drained or what? Or who should Pac fought at that time besides Floyd?

3.) Miguel Angel Cotto
This man was never going to be the same again after getting beaten BADLY by a dirty cheat with concrete in his gloves, as was evident in his struggle to overcome Clottey. When a fighter thrives on his unbeaten and invincible reputation it has irreversable effects when he is beaten and bloodied and battered thoroughly. It does things mentally to a fighter. I will give you examples if you don't understand. Was also somewhat exposed by Shane Mosley prior to the Margarito fight.

So Pacquiao is really a damaged good then. Have you seen the bony-skinny Pac got KOed, and the weight-drained Pac got KOed? Where is the irreversable effects? Have you seen Pac getting KD by Hussein both with legal blows and elbow+low blow? Have you seen how Morales and Marquez punished Pac? No need to even mentioned here how the malnourished Pac absorbed punches from his opponents. So Pac is really a damaged good now based on that logic.

4.) Ricky Hatton
A fighter who was exposed by Luis Collazo, and then again in more brutal fashion by Floyd Mayweather Jr. Hatton was done as a top fighter after the Mayweather fight. An accident waiting to happen. All his dreams went out of the window in 60 minutes with Mayweather. After that, every second interview was about retirement, he ballooned up in weight, just was not the fighter he once was. The motivation was gone.

Pac got more brutal punishments than Hatton. And Pacquiao is also a brawler.

5.) Oscar De La Hoya
Oscar looked malnourished, like a walking corpse, it was plain for everybody to see. He was a total shell of his former self, and Pacquiao was able to out-strength him with little trouble. Weakness at the weight, slowness, and lack of punch resistance are all clear signs of over-doing the weight cutting.

Pac is more malnourished in his younger years, even put a thingy on his short to have more weight. But then again he KO bigger opponents. I still have remember a malnourished Pac fighting a bigger and healthy (Aussie?) guy but it was a TKO win for Pac and his opponent nearly vomits in the ring.
But I admit Oscar is not the same Oscar we used to see.

[MtClimber]

How much does Top Rank pay you guys to do this?

$35 per post (at least one word, including OK, OMG, etc), you?

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

This thread is a case of ignorance.

People can keep writing paragraphs of this and that, but in the end the OP will just deny it, it's all the same.

So do yourself a favour and leave the OP to figure it out himself because everyone else has.

[White Briton]

Listen man, learn the language then come again. Pacquiao was not shot or damaged goods in the early stages of his career. Both phrases mean to show a steady decline in the ability of the fighter in question. Say a fighter is great, then he gets beaten up bad, then in every fight after that he looks like sh_t. Jeff Lacy for example. Miguel Cotto for another. The phrase for that is "damaged goods". We all know what shot means, surely.

[MtClimber]

^ ^ Bec. you try to twist the reality and make your hate conquer logic.

[BawK]

Listen man, learn the language then come again. Pacquiao was not shot or damaged goods in the early stages of his career. Both phrases mean to show a steady decline in the ability of the fighter in question. Say a fighter is great, then he gets beaten up bad, then in every fight after that he looks like sh_t. Jeff Lacy for example. Miguel Cotto for another. The phrase for that is "damaged goods". We all know what shot means, surely.

so what about Corrales? Meldrick Taylor? Amir Khan?

are they damaged goods later in their career?

[MtClimber]

Listen man, learn the language then come again. Pacquiao was not shot or damaged goods in the early stages of his career. Both phrases mean to show a steady decline in the ability of the fighter in question. Say a fighter is great, then he gets beaten up bad, then in every fight after that he looks like sh_t. Jeff Lacy for example. Miguel Cotto for another. The phrase for that is "damaged goods". We all know what shot means, surely.

That red, Pac goes through all that. Who said Pac was not beaten up? That's why I said Pac is also a damaged good if we follow that logic.

And who looks good against Clottey pre-Cotto?

[White Briton]

so what about Corrales? Meldrick Taylor? Amir Khan?

are they damaged goods later in their career?

Give me examples of what you're talking about in regards to Amir Khan? Corrales was not damaged goods in that sense. He couldn't make the weight and he couldn't compete with the bigger fighters in higher weight classes. He was in alot of wars though, so who knows. The guy is passed away though and I don't want to be disrespectful. What do you think about Meldrick Taylor? Is this a joke? C'mon man.

[MtClimber]

so what about Corrales? Meldrick Taylor? Amir Khan?

are they damaged goods later in their career?

True. And so are the other ATGs