Cathweight is BS if involves Pacquiao? How about againts Marquez?
Collapse
-
-
That's well and good then. We'll just anticipate and well crafted thread about JMM not suited at 47
He has 0 power at dictaing anything to pac. he's the one begging for it. For a good payday tooComment
-
WBC sanctioned Pacquiao vs Margarito for their 154 lbs belt at a catchweight of 150lbs.
Are you one who criticized this because according to you the belt should be defended at 154 regardless of size difference?
Think about and get an answer in your mind...
Now Juan Manuel Marquez is seeking Manny Pacquiao who is the current WBO Welterweight and WBC Jr Middleweight champion.
Some people are saying that the fight should be lower than 147 or at least 140 to augment the size difference? or maybe at a catcweight of 144. that means the chalenger is asking the champion for a catchweight? at least DLH didnt get smacked down after asking Hopkins to weigh 156.
Are you one who wants Pac-JMM lower than 147?
-------
Did you answer yes to the 2 bolded question?Comment
-
Even if Pac can make 140lbs, hes in a position where he doesnt have to be making concessions to anyone. Why dont people understand the difference?
Did Mayweather move down to 140 for Hatton or Marquez?Comment
-
WBC sanctioned Pacquiao vs Margarito for their 154 lbs belt at a catchweight of 150lbs.
Are you one who criticized this because according to you the belt should be defended at 154 regardless of size difference?
Think about and get an answer in your mind...
Now Juan Manuel Marquez is seeking Manny Pacquiao who is the current WBO Welterweight and WBC Jr Middleweight champion.
Some people are saying that the fight should be lower than 147 or at least 140 to augment the size difference? or maybe at a catcweight of 144. that means the chalenger is asking the champion for a catchweight? at least DLH didnt get smacked down after asking Hopkins to weigh 156.
Are you one who wants Pac-JMM lower than 147?
-------
Did you answer yes to the 2 bolded question?Comment
-
so you're saying Pac is wrong for asking career welterweight Margarto for a catchweight of 150lbs match
and
Pac is still wrong for refusing a catchweight for his 147 belt to meet Marquez?
huh?
you have to have a baseline opinion on cathweight bro. you cant have an opinion depending on a fighter. its either you are cool with catchweights or you dont like it.Last edited by Castor_Troy; 12-09-2010, 09:47 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I repeat.
so you're saying Pac is wrong for asking career welterweight Margarto for a catchweight of 150lbs match
and
Pac is still wrong for refusing a catchweight for his 147 belt to meet Marquez?
huh?
you have to have a baseline opinion on cathweight bro. you can have an opinion depending on a fighter. its either you are cool with catchweights or you dont like it.
I don't like catchweight fights at all, but if you're willing to take the advantages of catchweights, you should be willing to take the disadvantages too.Last edited by Rick Grimes; 12-09-2010, 09:47 PM.Comment
-
WBC sanctioned Pacquiao vs Margarito for their 154 lbs belt at a catchweight of 150lbs.
Are you one who criticized this because according to you the belt should be defended at 154 regardless of size difference?
Think about and get an answer in your mind...
Now Juan Manuel Marquez is seeking Manny Pacquiao who is the current WBO Welterweight and WBC Jr Middleweight champion.
Some people are saying that the fight should be lower than 147 or at least 140 to augment the size difference? or maybe at a catcweight of 144. that means the chalenger is asking the champion for a catchweight? at least DLH didnt get smacked down after asking Hopkins to weigh 156.
Are you one who wants Pac-JMM lower than 147?
-------
Did you answer yes to the 2 bolded question?
Manny challenged Cotto and asked the champ for a catchweight. (It's only 2 pounds) Remember.....
Manny can make 141/142, hell he just weighed 144 taking in 7000 cals rememberComment
Comment