Cathweight is BS if involves Pacquiao? How about againts Marquez?

[cixthree]

I'm saying when the boot's on the other foot Pacquiao doesn't want to play his game.

I don't like catchweight fights at all, but if you're willing to take the advantages of catchweights, you should be willing to take the disadvantages too.

Standing and clapping, there's a smart man in the room.... Co-sign bro

[neoz]

You guys are all morons.
Pacman has had one fight at catchweight against cotto. So has Marquez against Floyd.
Margarito fight wasn't really catchweight cause Margarito is a career 147 fighter.
Pacman calls the shots here. Pacman makes the money not Marquez.
Pacman can do say what he wants so please STFU.

[Castor_Troy]

I'm saying when the boot's on the other foot Pacquiao doesn't want to play his game.

I don't like catchweight fights at all, but if you're willing to take the advantages of catchweights, you should be willing to take the disadvantages too.

You're talking about Pacquiao, Thats fine you hate him.

but how about catchweights?


Are you cool with it or not?

[Castor_Troy]

You just owned yourself, Dumbazz!!!
Manny challenged Cotto and asked the champ for a catchweight. (It's only 2 pounds) Remember.....

Manny can make 141/142, hell he just weighed 144 taking in 7000 cals remember

Take Pacquiao out of your mind for a minute pls and then answer this question.



Do you support catchweight or not? Please answer it

[ADP02]

Manny weighed in at 144, have him drop the 2 pounds and fight JMM at 142.... It's just 2 pounds right?

Yes it's just 2lbs but you Floyd fans criticized Manny for fighting Cotto 1lb less than his previous weight and said why did Manny have to make Cotto do that.

So why then make Manny do that? Personally, I don't mind as long as I get to see a good fight but I'm asking you why the turn-around? Drop 1lb bad (Cotto), 2lb good (Manny)????

and like Castor said, do you like or dislike catch-weights?

[Pullcounter]

i thought *****s and pac-haters didn't want pac fighting catchweights anymore.