Comments Thread For: Pacquiao's Adviser: Mayweather Waiting For Manny To Age

[danny711]

I've thought the same thing.

[starkiller]

Floyds always in the gym, so even when he is inactive he hasn't stopped training. And it makes perfect sense because if someone else is able to give Pacquiao more punishment then thats the moment Floyd will want to fight him. Sugar Ray Leonard did the same **** to Marvin Hagler, waited until he took punishment from other fighters then took him on.

[shogunn]

Manny shouldve fought floyd right after Cotto, but we all knew what happened. Floyd duck style came in full effect.

That was a prime--physically peaked Manny that fought Cotto. Now he's taking shots from fighters much bigger than him, and on top of that, he's a congressman.

Floyd is doing nothing but taking pictures at mcdonalds, beating women, poking his finger and working out.

The longer the fight is held up, the more Manny is battle worn. Compared to floyd who stays fresh. His inactivity doesnt doesnt wear on him when being compared to Manny who's constantly taking on bigger fights. Clottey didnt land much, but his power at that size bruised up Mannys face pretty bad. The sooner the fight happens the better. If were talking 2 more years of back and forth bickering between both sides than the fight wont be as prestigous as it currently is.

[spoonwars]

Floyds always in the gym, so even when he is inactive he hasn't stopped training. And it makes perfect sense because if someone else is able to give Pacquiao more punishment then thats the moment Floyd will want to fight him. Sugar Ray Leonard did the same **** to Marvin Hagler, waited until he took punishment from other fighters then took him on.

This is the reasoning why Floyd claims he's better than those fighters. He intends to take that concept to the greatest level and set a new standard.

[starkiller]

Judges should have gave Hagler that win because it was a close fight and one fighter waited until the other one took punishment before stepping in the ring against them. I frown upon that type of ****.

[Apple Mac]

agreed with all the comments for this post, just say yes mayweather and both of you can fight. so we can see who is the p4p king of boxing once and for all.

Enough all you *****s and *******s. You just look silly amongst yourselves

[LeeVanCleef]

here is where you fail.

people being tested dont know when the cut off date is. if a boxer asks for a cut off date, then that defeats the purpose of random testing.

there is a cut off date which is determined by the USADA and is unanounced to the fighters. meaning the fighters dont decide

you fail

does that include Floyd as well? Or is he 'exempted'?

[fabie]

Come on that is B.S, is this the "new" excuse being drummed up if Floyd beats Pac. There is always a new excuse for if Floy'd beats Pac when they fight. Before it was Pac is too small, he'll be blood drained etc etc etc. Just let them fight and may the best man win no excuses.

Floyd's skills are greatly due to his reflexes, speed and athleticism. These are attributes that deteriorate in aging inactive boxers which Floyd fits the bill the longer the fight doesn't happen with Pac. Even Freddy Roach after Floyd's fight with Pac said that Floyd is slowing down. No amount of time of being in the gym can substitute or keep his skills at the level they would be if he was actively fighting.

As for Pac i do agree that his style of fighting would lead to more physical damage on a fighter causing wear and tear. But if they keep feeding him these slow prodding, no counter punching, come forward style of fighters he will have no wear and tear.

In all, both situations balance each other out and neither have a big advantage. If i were to choose one though i would rather be Pac and be the active fighter due to Floyd being inactive and needing to rely on his timing, sharpness and agility to effectively fight the way he does.

This is my detailed assessment of Floyd Mayweather vs Pacquiao if you care to read it. I am not a ******* nor a *****.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=439314

[TonkaJones]

I agree with this I think that if they fought its a close fight & I love Pac but I could see Mayweather beating him but I don't think Mayweather likes to go into a fight without being 99% sure he's going to win. he's too scared of losing that 0 on his record & is waiting for Pac to decline or get beaten. I hate when bxers with unbeaten records do this it would have been better for us fans if Mayweather had lost his 0 a long time ago (like in the 1st Castillo fight even though he won it) then he would fight anybody.

[laplapigos]

There, now that your challenge has been met, I double you to show me where anything I said was wrong.
Also tell me why u aren't calling Pac a ducker for walking away from the first negotiations when FMJ gave him the exact terms he said he would agree to after fighting Clottey?

Just like there are different

yeah too many facts so its that enough to accuse a person being too good in his performance has taken some PEDs? in case you dont know if you train hard before the fight you ll become durable, do you know why a boxer trains in high places?????oxygen level there are lower than in low places does stimulating your body to produce EPO.....so based on your facts you can accuse a good fighter from using those you mentioned above?????so it is right to accuse that boxers doing great uses PEDs for example mayweather???remember mayweather has only 1 fight with OST is it possible that he used PEDs in his previuos fights?