great response by ficher to pac criticism

[mikemurni]

I don't need to quote what's on here. Stop playing dumb. Your post was pretty idiotic and now you're whining because I "changed the subject" and ****. Now I should tell you what the topic is like I can't read or something? Yeah, ok.

So in other words, you dont know..

Your the one who butted in.. You're the one who said was non-sensical.. You replied to my post first. You initiated this argument. At least know what you are replying to first..So tell me if its really non-sensical then what was I implying..

[EMACULATE]

Valid points but it would seem that you could tell me then why he choose Clottey over Moseley whem Mosley was the Champ and called him out at the gym and him and Roach said Mosley was to good and your no Oscar. Is that an admission of ducking?

Point #2 Since he has a hard time making 147 with his own admission then why doesnt he beat on those young and hungry 140 pound guys. He can easily make 140 and every one knows that. There is a reason why he has avaided those guys like Arums favorite excuse is there not PPV attractions. Marquez or Mosley were never PPV attractions but when your fighting the P4P king will sell anyway and you hush alot of doubters about not fighting black or so called slick fighters.

Marquez very curious why Manny wants no part of this trilogy. He would rather fight Mosley a guy coming off two losses in reality or at least two lack luster performances. He fought Morrales three times and there was no way that those fights were even as competitive as Marquez was in both fights. This here is blatanat ducking. Just be honest. The same that applies to Floyd not fighting Margarito, Cotto and now maybe PAC. Lets be truthful.

[IMDAZED]

So in other words, you dont know..

Your the one who butted in.. You're the one who said was non-sensical.. You replied to my post first. You initiated this argument. At least know what you are replying to first..So tell me if its really non-sensical then what was I implying..

I already quoted your post and stated my issue. Stop being butt-hurt and get over it.

[mikemurni]

I already quoted your post and stated my issue. Stop being butt-hurt and get over it.

So it would be easy for you to tell me the topic, would it?

[Chups]

Like Dougie said, Pac will be criticized if he fights Mosley next year.

[IMDAZED]

So it would be easy for you to tell me the topic, would it?

Sure but why would that make your post any less idiotic? Is this what your debate has dwindled to? Whether I can tell you the topic? Like I couldn't read it? LOL, you make me laugh.

[mikemurni]

Sure but why would that make your post any less idiotic? Is this what your debate has dwindled to? Whether I can tell you the topic? Like I couldn't read it? LOL, you make me laugh.

Idiotic?? When you dont even know what you are arguing about...

[bayareamike]

Lmao imdazed is mad don't mind the *****. He's the only nonsensical one trying make sense but getting owned. Lmao quite funny.

[Pullcounter]

And this excuses him for fighting a 40 year old who hasn't won a fight in 2 years?

so you wanna see mosley/pac in early 2011 right?

[serv]

Like Dougie said, Pac will be criticized if he fights Mosley next year.

He will be criticized whoever he fights next year... Hell, he will still be criticized if he fights and beat floyd...

The haters will come out and claim he is ducking the Klitschko brothers. That's how it goes with the intelligence level of people claiming to be boxing fans.