Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Just Watched Calzaghe vs Hopkins again with my eyes open

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Just Watched Calzaghe vs Hopkins again with my eyes open

    how can you honestly say calzaghe won if you watch the fight closely? yea he threw a bunch of punches that missed but if you look closely he was getting countered over and over again. stop getting fooled by all the calzaghe flair. appearing to do something is not the same as actually doing it. hopkins landed the cleaner punches and made calzaghe miss. why would you lose a fight if you do that? "faking low blows" isn't a scoring criteria remember.

    here's actual evidence that calzaghe lost but watch out you might have to open your eyes and use your brain for once instead of being hypnotized by the windmill slap furries.

    after watching this there is no possible way you can say calzaghe deserved to win. the judges were fooled by ineffective aggression and a pro calzaghe crowd that went crazy every time he threw. calzaghe knows he lost that fight. look at enzo in the corner, look at joe's face during the decision, look at his remarks after the fight about never fighting hopkins again.








  • #2






    Comment


    • #3
      You just have to let this go mate..it was 2 years ago.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by yuppie View Post
        You just have to let this go mate..it was 2 years ago.
        no i'm going to get the decision changed! this is a boxing forum isn't that what we are suppose to debate about? people still argue over the leonard-hagler decision that was 25 years ago. except that fight is harder to score because both guys were landing punches unlike this one where only one guy is.

        Comment


        • #5
          did you make them videos?

          Comment


          • #6

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by daggum View Post
              no i'm going to get the decision changed! this is a boxing forum isn't that what we are suppose to debate about? people still argue over the leonard-hagler decision that was 25 years ago. except that fight is harder to score because both guys were landing punches unlike this one where only one guy is.
              yeah but there is already a good calzaghe/nard debate on the front page...was there really a need for two?...or you just needed special attention to make your point without anyone saying otherwise?...

              Comment


              • #8
                Joe deserved to win imo. But different strokes for different folks. : )

                Comment


                • #9
                  It was close but if it had to go to someone it should have been B-Hop.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ^^^ come on SG... how can u say that!!!!! i know Bhop is your boy.. but sloppy beat him..... it wasnt a pleasant fight... but still he got the W

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP