Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Floyd Mayweather is Not on a Pacquiao (Rolex) clock!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Gino Ros View Post
    Damn...you just KILLED him.
    LOL. grus has a hype-man? since when?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by MrWestGrand View Post
      "Right now, I feel good. I never really took no abuse in the sport. I feel great. But the kid that’s going to beat Floyd Mayweather hasn’t been born yet.Yes, he may, he may have been born—it may be one of my sons."
      lols... self fulfilling prophecy FAIL!!! wifebeater's son's testimony will **** him up in court!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
        Tired of their s#!t fam. I am notices that nobody
        has anything to say? I mean, come on! The facts
        are right there in EVERYONE faces and hate plus
        denial is not a good team. I refuse to have anyone
        try to play me like a fool and Arum has been doing it
        for YEARS with most of these people. Never understood
        why people don't want to know or acknowledge the
        truth?
        tell me some facts then (that we already dont know)...
        dude, you sound like some bitter old conspiracy theorist.
        let me save you the effort:
        • arum is the evil empire, the ONLY crooked fight promoter
        • pac is the devil, his whole career is a complete fake... steward, ****m, etc is full of **** because they acknowledge the fact pac has accomplished something.
        • pac is guilty of using [insert illegal substance name] to help his "padded" career. since theres plenty of proof
        • floyd will KO pac in 1 round, since thats what floyd DOES.
        • floyd NEVER ducked anyone, they just didnt OFFICIALLY call him out.
        • JMM at 147 was LEGIT... he was a top p4p-er right??
        • insert floyd PPV numbers and annual income here.
        • insert EVERY article that states floyd he ducked nobody
        • floyd has ABSOLUTELY no flaws.
        • GBP is the ONLY righteous promotors that DONT do in-house fights.
        • pac is a fraud because he cant fight at 135 & 154 simultaneously.

        there it is. LOL. did i miss anything?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
          come out come out wherever you are, stop being a coward
          found him

          Comment


          • Originally posted by waxfondler View Post
            but bradley/alexander/berto is ready for pac??? but people STILL want the fight anyway.... floyd beats cotto, but cotto wouldve put something on floyd... the thing is i would rather see a fighter beat a guy, instead of saying he will but not do it... prime cotto was a solid boxer, IMO, he would have shined the light on a few flaws of floyd (as well as add mileage to floyd)... margs DEFINITELY wouldve put some mileage on floyd... there were PLENTY of styles for floyd to mix it up with... but he chooses GBP sacrifices (ricky/jmm/shane)... plus, floyd refuses to pay sanctioning fees and keep belts.... excusing himself from DEFENDING. on the other spectrum, pac is collecting trinket belts and completely disregards defending... neither are good for the sport.
            What? I mean I agree that Cotto/Floyd would have been a great
            fight but honestly. Cotto NEVER pushed for the fight and Floyd
            didn't either. When Floyd was ready for Cotto, Cotto wasn't.
            Solid boxer? You mean fighter. Cotto got hit big in every major
            fight he has been in and hurt quite a few times. On top of that,
            Cotto with all of his supposed to be "Boxing skills" he couldn't
            even technically adjust to Antonio Margarito to land his
            best punch "A body shot". We can debate all day but at
            the end, Cotto/Margarito was a lil hyped up. Once they stepped
            up the competition it got hard for them. A prime undefeated
            Cotto struggled against Mosley and back peddled in that fight.
            Cotto was/is a good fighter but never has been on Floyd's level
            and that's coming from a style perspective. In my opinion, Cotto
            would have got Gatti with a mixture of Corrales in the ring with
            Floyd. Too easy to hit and once you take his punch and pressure
            away he was lunch meat.

            Comment


            • Comment


              • Originally posted by waxfondler View Post
                i would like to spend countless hours trying to prove some forum poster wrong... frankly, does it even matter? grus, i know you know your stuff, but i also know youre far from being unbiased... bottom line, floyd SHOULDVE fought those dudes... he wouldve beat them, but it would have defined his career even more (and what if he lost??? he got a gift from the first castillo fight)... please dont act like floyd didnt take the easy route... you guys can justify the judahs, baldomirs, fat jmms, all you want... but those victories are just as empty as pac's clottey/margs wins...

                there are PLENTY of people claiming pac ducked people in LW division. LOL.
                you cant please everybody.
                I agree that the fight was close and debatable but Floyd fought
                and beat Castillo no questions asked in the rematch when Castillo
                was heavier as a WW and Floyd was 138 at Lightweight. I am unbiased
                but don't cosign the **** people put on Floyd because it's not true.
                Floyd tried to make the fight with Cotto but Cotto wasn't ready
                and Margarito could have happened but Arum/Mayweather fell
                out over the De La Hoya fight. Those are facts. How can you
                said what he could of did when he tried to do it? Judah was
                the UNDISPUTED WW champion when Floyd signed to fight him
                and when Baldomir beat Judah, Floyd fought him and became the
                Lineal champion. Cotto and Margarito wasn't holding titles of
                status like that. Pacquiao hasn't fought ANYONE undefeated
                or a legit champion (Except Hatton) and even Floyd took his
                "0". I just can't give Pac a past because unlike Floyd, he is not
                fighting people coming off of wins or legit champions like Floyd has.
                Am I wrong about that?

                Comment


                • seeing page after page of dedicated hatred towards floyd from this tribe of simple, shrimp d!ck, pigmees is amazing. i thought i would have to watch the discovery channel to watch the spiritual beliefs of these shrimp d!ck pigmees. mayweather the devil of their religion, pacquiao the god of their religion. its intriguing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                    lols... self fulfilling prophecy FAIL!!! wifebeater's son's testimony will **** him up in court!
                    Some what but look man, Floyd's trial is minor compared to him not being able to be with his family. Regardless of how you feel about the man, He has proven to be a pretty good father by most standards. So by his sons statements(which is really what the case is about), leads me to believe that is the main reason of his silence lately. Exactly what can his son's testimony really do? I don't know, but he didn't beat the little boy, and the domestic abuse charges are misdemeanors. I'm sure he wants to resolve the issue, so he can 1st see his Kids again, and then get back to boxing.

                    Comment


                    • Title of thread seems inappropriate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP