What do you want me to compromise on? Repetition begets repetition.
It's not the key factor. Another guy observed that he is, in truth, built about average for the weight. His measurements are solid. That's that.
If he gets rid of Wegner, replaces him with someone good and dedicates, he can improve.
Truth is often said in jest, Kris. And your Calzaghe man-love is the guiding light behind your resentment of Carl. And that is utterly Gay.
Don't take **** so seriously, BTW. It's just a figure of speech.
Who cares? Lighten up. Like his banter, don't like his banter, he's all spirit and he delivers the fights people want to see - if you can't get behind that, you're silly!
**** Joe, okay? I followed him the whole time he was active, but his career was a ****ing disappointment, ultimately. I don't blame him for much, but I'm not going to inflate what he did to make myself feel about the sense of unfulfilled promise.
You know why I support Carl? It's not because I've always been predisposed to support fighters who are derided as slow, defenceless chins on legs. My support for Carl owes to some fairly objective reasoning - while I've long insisted his skills were somewhat slept on, the reason I've always backed Froch, aside from finding him amusing, is his attitude, his spirit, his willingness to put it on the line. He's a rare treasure in this climate.
Now he's exceeding my expectations of him (I bet on him to get caught and stopped against AA, with the hope he'd prove me wrong) and it's a beautiful thing. Much more enjoyable an experience than suspecting a guy had something special and following his career only to see him never push his limits consistently and retire an underachiever.
Eubank and Benn were domestic stars in the era of Bruno.
Naz was a star in the era of Lewis.
Khan's as big a Star as Haye, I could've used him as an example instead.
Haye's marketing is aided by the ****s at Sky Sports, who lie through their ****-stained teeth for him.
Now what's your excuse for saying Froch isn't worhy of Stardom? Either you're ****** or you know full well he is and are just denying him for spite.
Doesn't matter if those fools never get the memo. The people who know where it's at will make Carl a cult treasure.
Yep, in my considered and educated opinion, which >>>>>>>> yours. Suck it up.
To the bold, nope. Again, it doesn't matter if those fools never get the memo. The people who know where it's at will make Carl a cult treasure.
I'm not the one who's insisting my guy is God. Did I just say that his performances have exceeded my expectations (which were believing and spirited, but also hopeful and tentative) up to now? I'm well aware of Froch's fallibility and am a little edgy about his next fight...but even if he takes an 'L' against Johnson, that's still another quality name on the record and one that Joe didn't touch, t'boot.
I didn't "attack" you. I said it that it's silly to allow yourself to love a male like a female would and then to let that blind you to reality.
That's incredibly rich.
There's nothing objective about you when it comes to Froch and Calzaghe. That's long established.
I called you Gay. It's figurative, I'm not suggesting you might really fellate guys and if you do it's not my business. Don't be so silly.
It's not the key factor. Another guy observed that he is, in truth, built about average for the weight. His measurements are solid. That's that.
If he gets rid of Wegner, replaces him with someone good and dedicates, he can improve.
Truth is often said in jest, Kris. And your Calzaghe man-love is the guiding light behind your resentment of Carl. And that is utterly Gay.
Don't take **** so seriously, BTW. It's just a figure of speech.
Who cares? Lighten up. Like his banter, don't like his banter, he's all spirit and he delivers the fights people want to see - if you can't get behind that, you're silly!
**** Joe, okay? I followed him the whole time he was active, but his career was a ****ing disappointment, ultimately. I don't blame him for much, but I'm not going to inflate what he did to make myself feel about the sense of unfulfilled promise.
You know why I support Carl? It's not because I've always been predisposed to support fighters who are derided as slow, defenceless chins on legs. My support for Carl owes to some fairly objective reasoning - while I've long insisted his skills were somewhat slept on, the reason I've always backed Froch, aside from finding him amusing, is his attitude, his spirit, his willingness to put it on the line. He's a rare treasure in this climate.
Now he's exceeding my expectations of him (I bet on him to get caught and stopped against AA, with the hope he'd prove me wrong) and it's a beautiful thing. Much more enjoyable an experience than suspecting a guy had something special and following his career only to see him never push his limits consistently and retire an underachiever.
Eubank and Benn were domestic stars in the era of Bruno.
Naz was a star in the era of Lewis.
Khan's as big a Star as Haye, I could've used him as an example instead.
Haye's marketing is aided by the ****s at Sky Sports, who lie through their ****-stained teeth for him.
Now what's your excuse for saying Froch isn't worhy of Stardom? Either you're ****** or you know full well he is and are just denying him for spite.
Doesn't matter if those fools never get the memo. The people who know where it's at will make Carl a cult treasure.
Yep, in my considered and educated opinion, which >>>>>>>> yours. Suck it up.
To the bold, nope. Again, it doesn't matter if those fools never get the memo. The people who know where it's at will make Carl a cult treasure.
I'm not the one who's insisting my guy is God. Did I just say that his performances have exceeded my expectations (which were believing and spirited, but also hopeful and tentative) up to now? I'm well aware of Froch's fallibility and am a little edgy about his next fight...but even if he takes an 'L' against Johnson, that's still another quality name on the record and one that Joe didn't touch, t'boot.
I didn't "attack" you. I said it that it's silly to allow yourself to love a male like a female would and then to let that blind you to reality.
That's incredibly rich.
There's nothing objective about you when it comes to Froch and Calzaghe. That's long established.
I called you Gay. It's figurative, I'm not suggesting you might really fellate guys and if you do it's not my business. Don't be so silly.
Comment