Time for Calzaghe nuthuggers to admit.......

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MACAQUEINBLACK
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 7720
    • 485
    • 1,170
    • 10,473

    #51
    Originally posted by Forza
    Is that why he lost? Did he beat dirrell too? lol moron
    Everyone who ever dropped a decision unarguably lost?

    According to that definition, yeah, he beat Dirrell.

    LOL, moron.

    Comment

    • ny123
      WBGC GOLD CHAMPION
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 8497
      • 236
      • 526
      • 15,369

      #52
      Originally posted by MAN IN WHITE
      Everyone who ever dropped a decision unarguably lost?

      Accoring to that definition, yeah, he beat Dirrell.

      LOL, moron.
      Honestly do you believe he deserved the win against Dirrell? Dirrell is probably my least favorite fighter but imo even though he made it ugly he clearly won that fight.

      Comment

      • MACAQUEINBLACK
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 7720
        • 485
        • 1,170
        • 10,473

        #53
        Originally posted by Forza
        kessler made him look like a C level fighter
        calzaghe made kessler look like a C level fighter


        cal > kessler > froch
        The bold, what planet are you on??


        Nobody made the other look C Class in those fights.



        Froch > Kessler. Quite arguably should have gotten the nod against him and will quite likely finish with a better résumé than Sikkel-Bench Kessler.

        Comment

        • Forza
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 6069
          • 373
          • 161
          • 13,461

          #54
          Why didn't he get the nod then? It was because he got outclassed.

          Both are non-americans so you can;t claim american bias

          Comment

          • RichCCFC
            46-0
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 12846
            • 441
            • 132
            • 22,116

            #55
            Originally posted by MAN IN WHITE
            No, I just think you're an epically **** poster and a ****-swinger.


            In fact, most posters here do.



            You've always been complete and utter worthless, steamy GAH-BAGE as a poster. The post I'm responding to now is just "talking ****" without any valid points attached - there's your difference.


            Could say the same about you.

            Comment

            • MACAQUEINBLACK
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 7720
              • 485
              • 1,170
              • 10,473

              #56
              Originally posted by ny123
              Honestly do you believe he deserved the win against Dirrell? Dirrell is probably my least favorite fighter but imo even though he made it ugly he clearly won that fight.
              Froch's jab was overlooked in most posters' scoring of that fight and I always said it, not just saying it now.


              I can see an argument for Froch winning more rounds.

              Comment

              • MACAQUEINBLACK
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 7720
                • 485
                • 1,170
                • 10,473

                #57
                Originally posted by RichCCFC


                Could say the same about you.
                'Fraid not, pal.


                You've been laughed out of here more times thanb I can count in 3 years.


                Apart from a small few detractors who took things personally, my rep is much better. There's a reason for that. I'm a much better poster.

                Comment

                • RichCCFC
                  46-0
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 12846
                  • 441
                  • 132
                  • 22,116

                  #58
                  Originally posted by MAN IN WHITE
                  Everyone who ever dropped a decision unarguably lost?

                  According to that definition, yeah, he beat Dirrell.

                  LOL, moron.
                  there you go again

                  Originally posted by MAN IN WHITE
                  The bold, what planet are you on??


                  Nobody made the other look C Class in those fights.



                  Froch > Kessler. Quite arguably should have gotten the nod against him and will quite likely finish with a better résumé than Sikkel-Bench Kessler.
                  Well quite clearly Kessler beat Froch yet you make statements to the contrary, doesn't that make you the moron?

                  Comment

                  • HitmanHattonAY
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 2138
                    • 72
                    • 167
                    • 12,617

                    #59
                    Froch has beat some top class fighters:

                    Pascal
                    Taylor
                    Dirrell
                    Abraham

                    that is not a bad resume !!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • PEBBLES!
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 6673
                      • 463
                      • 271
                      • 14,623

                      #60
                      Originally posted by RichCCFC
                      there you go again



                      Well quite clearly Kessler beat Froch yet you make statements to the contrary, doesn't that make you the moron?
                      Kessler didn't beat Froch clearly, mate.


                      Many observers had Froch winning that fight - it was a close fight which could've gone either way.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP