Time for Calzaghe nuthuggers to admit.......

[Squizz]

Calzaghe didnt really beat Hopkins though.

The British press as well as Enzo Calzaghe scored the fight for Hopkins.

See, I don't understand this. I've watched that fight many times. And I've always thought Calzaghe won it.

[PEBBLES!]

I've seen the fight many times also and I always score it for Hopkins.

Twas a really close fight.

[Tyson.]

I've seen the fight many times also and I always score it for Hopkins.

Twas a really close fight.

Hopkins is a ****** so he deserves the benefit.

Calzaghe didnt want no rematch. Enzo Calzaghe and the British press scored it for Hopkins also.

[Xyei]

He arguably did.



The triangulation theories aren't helping you JC semen-gulpers, either way.

Yeah, I thought Froch won the fight and I've said it many times.

[PEBBLES!]

Hopkins is a ****** so he deserves the benefit.

Calzaghe didnt want no rematch. Enzo Calzaghe and the British press scored it for Hopkins also.

Stop trolling son.


Religion has nothing to do with it.

[Tyson.]

See, I don't understand this. I've watched that fight many times. And I've always thought Calzaghe won it.

Effective punching.

1 Bhop puch is worth a 100 Calzaghe slaps.

Plus you have the KD in the 1st round.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Oh my god, you read through my posts until 2008 to find my prediction for Cotto vs Margarito, lmao!

It was a close fight, Margarito won. So what? Cotto was the better fighter but lost to pressure, anyone could see Froch is better than Abraham.

Nope, I did a lightning-quick search for 'Cotto Margarito' under your name and clicked the first predictions thread I saw.


The point is, you can't break down a fight because you're useless at analyzing fighters or just don't watch enough.

Most fights look pretty much how I see them in my head. LMAO @ the details of your Cotto-Tony call.


It's not a case of Froch being 'better' than Abraham - for me, it was whether he would be good enough for 12 rounds and not get caught. I'm glad to be wrong. Froch's jab was MUCH better tonight than it's ever been, not lazy at all, and that was the key to the fight.


You're the one who resorted to lazy cheap-shotting about the sig, and you still lost at that. LOLOL.

I've seen the fight many times also and I always score it for Hopkins.

Twas a really close fight.

Same, although I try to avoid watching that fight.


I remember being really disappointed before the cards were read, because I was certain Joe hadn't done enough and had lost more rounds than won.

[jrosales13]

Hopkins is a ****** so he deserves the benefit.

Calzaghe didnt want no rematch. Enzo Calzaghe and the British press scored it for Hopkins also.

Who's alt are you sweetheart?

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Yeah, I thought Froch won the fight and I've said it many times.

Watching live, without scoring, I thought Kessler edged it.



I watched the film of the fight 4 times afterwards and scored each time - scored 4 different ways, with 2 draws and 2 Froch wins...none of my cards came up for Kessler.



Kessler didn't "clearly win" at all.

[Tyson.]

Stop trolling son.


Religion has nothing to do with it.

Religon plays a big part in boxing.

The likes of Ali, Tyson, Naz, Caballero are all ******s. They all back *********, I thought you did also.