Sergio Martinez was WEIGHT DRAINED WITH A CATCHWEIGHT, so how come he won?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoZz
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 8812
    • 876
    • 779
    • 45,907

    #11
    Originally posted by Willie Swindler
    catchweights have absolutely zero effect on the outcome of fights. its more of a false sense of security for fighters.

    for elite fighters, a couple of lbs dont matter. people are so ****** to think the reason why oscar lost was because of the catchweight hence the prominence of using the catchweight as a excuse to discredit wins & fighters.

    24 rehydration rule absolutely makes criticisms irrelevant.
    you are an idiot seriously just look at ODLH when he fought pacquiao he looked like a crack head at fight night.

    but you're in love with pac so i know martinez pissed you off with saying that catch weight is for paper chumps like pac

    Comment

    • Ragnar Lothbrok
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 6329
      • 532
      • 573
      • 7,422

      #12
      Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
      let it go swindler...
      Im a soldier in the frontlines of the ******* ***** wars....

      we shall never surrender.


      Originally posted by boxer2k5
      who said he was weight drained? he never complained bout the weight? and pwill forgot to take his special shakes
      see look at this aloof *******. according to *****sexual medical catchweight researchers:

      catchweights are bad & drain & make fighters zombies & irrelevant zombies. did you read the opening post & the link?


      As that opening post & link provided, i beg to differ.


      Trust me, if sergio got dominated, the people ready to criticize williams will be using the catch weigth none sense.

      Comment

      • Ragnar Lothbrok
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 6329
        • 532
        • 573
        • 7,422

        #13
        Originally posted by Mercedes Benz
        you are an idiot seriously just look at ODLH when he fought pacquiao he looked like a crack head at fight night.

        but you're in love with pac so i know martinez pissed you off with saying that catch weight is for paper chumps like pac
        well here comes the first catchweight medical researcher.

        So how come those other fights i listed, bigger guys who had to go down in catchweights didnt lose including sergio?

        u think the reason why oscar lost was because of the catchweight?

        Didnt you just see the fight this weekend? Didnt you just read the examples i posted in the OP? or the link i showed you?


        you ****ing *****sexual fa ggot asss floyd fluffing floids virus infested maggot.

        Comment

        • Blooper
          ooops...
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 1668
          • 239
          • 140
          • 8,833

          #14
          cmon willie.

          it's common knowledge that you just use catchweights as an excuse to knock someone when it's convenient for you.

          please disregard sergio's performance since it will debunk ppl's assertion that pac is winning only because his opponents are terribly weight drained.

          Comment

          • Ragnar Lothbrok
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 6329
            • 532
            • 573
            • 7,422

            #15
            Originally posted by Blooper
            cmon willie.

            it's common knowledge that you just use catchweights as an excuse to knock someone when it's convenient for you.

            please disregard sergio's performance since it will debunk ppl's assertion that pac is winning only because his opponents are terribly weight drained.
            it does the opposite.

            my opening posts & examples posted & the link provided support the fact that catchweights have absolutely NO EFFECT on the outcome of the fight.

            sergio's performance is just another verification that catchweights HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE FIGHT.

            Comment

            • karrapato
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 461
              • 15
              • 13
              • 6,554

              #16
              Ok.

              De La Hoya was at his top when fought Pacquiao.

              :x

              Comment

              • Blooper
                ooops...
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 1668
                • 239
                • 140
                • 8,833

                #17
                Originally posted by Willie Swindler
                it does the opposite.

                my opening posts & examples posted & the link provided support the fact that catchweights have absolutely NO EFFECT on the outcome of the fight.

                sergio's performance is just another verification that catchweights HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE FIGHT.
                yeah but what else will they use as an excuse to knock pac?

                i guess they will just have to stick with ost.

                Comment

                • TheGreatA
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 14143
                  • 633
                  • 271
                  • 21,863

                  #18
                  De La Hoya didn't fight at a catchweight though.

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #19
                    [sarcasm] pwill is on roids. he needs to take OSt [/sarcasm]

                    Comment

                    • Ragnar Lothbrok
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 6329
                      • 532
                      • 573
                      • 7,422

                      #20
                      Originally posted by TheGreatA
                      De La Hoya didn't fight at a catchweight though.
                      greatA, what's your opinion on the 24 hr rehydration rule in today's era & in particular to smaller fighters such as floyd & pac having to fight fighters on fight night 2-3 divisions above them?

                      oldschool fighters never had to deal with that. when willie pep fought a featherweight, he fought a featherweight on fight night.

                      when henry armsrtong fougth welters he fought welters on fight night.

                      with the 24 hr rehydration rule, smaller fighters like pac & floyd fighting in bigger divisions are having to fight fighters on fight night 2-3 divisions bigger.

                      HOw do we analyze that & put in historical context in terms of credit?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP