..One Thing Seems To Bother Me Most About Kotelnik-Alexander...

[Dirk Diggler UK]

If you view one as a robbery they both were~

Unless you are outright saying you have zero objectivity.


Next.

What a ridiculous statement. They were not identical fights. No two fights are. Kotelnik was landing clean punches throughout the fight and landed more punches than Dirrell. Dirrell spent a lot of time holding, falling down, running around not landing. None of which Kotelnik did.

Zero objectivity? I scored it for Dirrell

Stop it.

[The Gambler1981]

What a ridiculous statement. They were not identical fights. No two fights are. Kotelnik was landing clean punches throughout the fight and landed more punches. Dirrell spent a lot of time holding, falling down, running around not landing. None of which Kotelnik did.

Zero objectivity? I scored it for Dirrell

Stop it.

Dirrell still landed many more clean head snapping punches in every round. If you are landing the better punches every round how doesn't that get you a wide win? If it is pleasing to the eye really has no meaning.

You aren't objective because you aren't calling a spade a spade and making excuses based on reason that don't effect scoring.

every fight is different, but the scoring of fights is the same if you are landing more better punches you should win, how you land them really means very little. Unless of course you are talking body versus head shots which everyone knows get scored differently.

Here is a tip don't score fight if you don't know how it will make the game more enjoyable~

Next.

[sigrab jr]

If you view one as a robbery they both were~

Unless you are outright saying you have zero objectivity.


Next.

You're seriously arguing with that **** head Dirk? Just let him be. Look at where he is from. Although even British boxing fans agree Dirrell was robbed, that's one fan that will never call that fight a robbery. Then turns around calls Alexander-Kotelnik a robbery, where Alexander put up a better fight than Froch did and actually won rounds.

[The Gambler1981]

You're seriously arguing with that **** head Dirk? Just let him be. Look at where he is from. Although even British boxing fans agree Dirrell was robbed, that's one fan that will never call that fight a robbery. Then turns around calls Alexander-Kotelnik a robbery, where Alexander put up a better fight than Froch did and actually won rounds.

I enjoy what I do, I have time to kill anyways.

[sigrab jr]

I enjoy what I do, I have time to kill anyways.

Notice how he says he scored the fight for Dirrell but refuses to call it a robbery.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Dirrell still landed many more clean head snapping punches in every round. If you are landing the better punches every round how doesn't that get you a wide win? If it is pleasing to the eye really has no meaning.

You aren't objective because you aren't calling a spade a spade and making excuses based on reason that don't effect scoring.

every fight is different, but the scoring of fights is the same if you are landing more better punches you should win, how you land them really means very little.

Here is a tip don't score fight if you don't know how it will make the game more enjoyable~

But he didnt land clean punches in every round. Go back and watch the fight and try again. Heres a tip - maybe this time without the Michigan tinted specs? The first 2 rounds, hardly anything clean was landed whatsoever. And if you're dominating a fight, you wouldnt need to resort to the antics Dirrell did.

Kotelnik never needed to because he was so in control of the fight. I had Dirrell winning on cleaner punches but he landed nowhere near the amount Kotelnik did. It was far more sporadic. He didnt dominate the fight.

Like i said, poor comparison but if you want to continue rambling off-topic, be my guest.

LOL@ "you have to say both were robberies". Uhhh....no....no i dont.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You're seriously arguing with that **** head Dirk? Just let him be. Look at where he is from. Although even British boxing fans agree Dirrell was robbed, that's one fan that will never call that fight a robbery. Then turns around calls Alexander-Kotelnik a robbery, where Alexander put up a better fight than Froch did and actually won rounds.

Yeah and hes from Dirrell's home state...lol. I aint from Nottigham. Good one **** head.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Notice how he says he scored the fight for Dirrell but refuses to call it a robbery.

Thats because it wasnt. Damn your slow. I scored it for Dirrell by 1 point.

[sigrab jr]

Ah, what a clown.

[The Gambler1981]

But he didnt land clean punches in every round. Go back and watch the fight and try again. Heres a tip - maybe this time without the Michigan tinted specs? The first 2 rounds, hardly anything clean was landed whatsoever. And if you're dominating a fight, you wouldnt need to resort to the antics Dirrell did.

Kotelnik never needed to because he was so in control of the fight. I had Dirrell winning on cleaner punches but he landed nowhere near the amount Kotelnik did. It was far more sporadic. He didnt dominate the fight.

Like i said, poor comparison but if you want to continue rambling off-topic, be my guest.

LOL@ "you have to say both were robberies". Uhhh....no....no i dont.

He landed better punches every round than Froch did and more of them, Froch was the only person in that fight to get their head snapped back.

How one person fights has zero meaning on the score, the question is who is more effective. If you can't look beyond tactics you dislike you should not be scoring fights.

Even in ugly fights who is landing more better blows is the winner, and that was Dirrell in almost every round.

Kotelnik was the victim because Alexander threw way more punches, something Froch didn't even attempt, when the crowd goes crazy at everythign thrown it is tough to figure out exactly what lands from a judges point of view.

It was like the exact same situation but in reverse, and you ain't calling it like that.


Next.