Which one of Pacquiao's divisional titles am i missing?
Collapse
-
-
In theory he didn't actually win a title when he fought Barrera but Barrera was the man in the division and HAD the belt and didnt loose it so its pretty evident what the deal is.Comment
-
I think it's kind of BS calling Pac a 7 time Divisional Champ, but then again I think the belts these days are even more BS.Comment
-
The same "belt"(really is just a trophy not a belt since there is no rankings nor do you defend it, but some people I am looking at you, are not smart enough to tell the difference) that will be giving out to the winner of Hopkins-Pascal.
Anyways, the only "REAL BELT"(and is hardly a real belt, but is one of the 4 major sanctioning bodies) that was on the line for Pac-Cotto was the WBO.Comment
-
Is kind of bs in terms of so many belts nowadays and plenty more divisions.
However, he is a true real lineal 4 division champ. And, nobody has done that.
And, all 4 weight-classes have a very rich history. Is not like minimumweight, jr flyweight, super middleweight or cruiserweight division. Which the history is not that much.Comment
-
I see you aren't smart enough to read sarcasm. It's cool though, thanks for the thorough overview. I appreciate it.The same "belt"(really is just a trophy not a belt since there is no rankings nor do you defend it, but some people I am looking at you, are not smart enough to tell the difference) that will be giving out to the winner of Hopkins-Pascal.
Anyways, the only "REAL BELT"(and is hardly a real belt, but is one of the 4 major sanctioning bodies) that was on the line for Pac-Cotto was the WBO.
Comment
-
Comment

true.........
Comment