Name fighters who you think should be undefeated, but have losses

[Swag Hustla]

Whitaker before the Tito fight.

[straightleft]

I'll start

1. Marcos Maidana

I thought he did enough to beat Kotelnik who is his only loss. He outworked him and deserved the W. He should have definitely gotten the nod.

2. Andre Direll

Yes he fought like a ***** against Froch which is why a lot of you think he deserved an L but he clearly outpointed froch. its not even disputable.

3. Manny Pacquiao

this man has been terrorizing bigger opponents. I think it's time we question the validity of his first two losses. It's clear as daylight that his first two losses came at the hands of two A-side meth users. And Roger did say that A-side meth is strong. Before any one agrees and brings up Morales let me point out that Pacquiao didn't have his lucky socks that night.

Pac could be undefeated if he has a good trainer like Roach early in his career to learn all the necessary skills and tricks that he has today. Pac before Roach winning all his fight by pure speed and power. Now he is a complete machine. He could be also a 9 division title holder right now as he skipped two weight classes.

[Bushbaby]

Felix Sturm!!

[Anti~Jalandoni]

Felix Sturm!!

hahaahah.....**** no

[Anti~Jalandoni]

Whitaker before the Tito fight.

Dela Hoya Fight?

[Scott9945]

Felix Sturm!!

You do know that he got KO'd, right?

[daggum]

peter buckley and reggie strickland