Name fighters who you think should be undefeated, but have losses

**Hi-Dro** · 11-03-2010, 06:27 PM

Originally posted by Chups

It has to be Emanuel Augustus (Won 38 lost 33 draw 6)
Because he is an exciting fighter, those losses should not be a loss.

You're clearly an Emanueltard. Sorry bro no nuthuggers in this thread. Keep it real and post facts.

**John Hue** · 11-03-2010, 06:39 PM

Hagler comes to mind.

**infamous larryx** · 11-03-2010, 06:41 PM

ali...

frazier loss was politics
holmes-was bull****
norton=he was robbed
spinks-politics

**infamous larryx** · 11-03-2010, 06:42 PM

tommy morrison..he was just taking a nap against ray mercer

**infamous larryx** · 11-03-2010, 06:42 PM

valuev..robbed against haye and chagaev

**Hi-Dro** · 11-03-2010, 06:46 PM

damn larry why are you trolling my thread. what i wrote is scientific evidence whereas you are just trolling.

**DET. IRONSIDE** · 11-03-2010, 06:48 PM

Originally posted by thephantom5

Marvin Hagler.

Co-sign that

**EeZz** · 11-03-2010, 06:50 PM

Originally posted by Chups

It has to be Emanuel Augustus (Won 38 lost 33 draw 6)
Because he is an exciting fighter, those losses should not be a loss.

the first man to use the two punch in one combo should be undefeated imo.

manny have no originality, shame on him!

**Hi-Dro** · 11-03-2010, 06:58 PM

bunch of haters in this thread

**infamous larryx** · 11-03-2010, 07:01 PM

Originally posted by Dro

damn larry why are you trolling my thread. what i wrote is scientific evidence whereas you are just trolling.

show me one post that cant be supported by science..just one

Comment