Tweet
I'll start
1. Marcos Maidana
I thought he did enough to beat Kotelnik who is his only loss. He outworked him and deserved the W. He should have definitely gotten the nod.
2. Andre Direll
Yes he fought like a ***** against Froch which is why a lot of you think he deserved an L but he clearly outpointed froch. its not even disputable.
3. Manny Pacquiao
this man has been terrorizing bigger opponents. I think it's time we question the validity of his first two losses. It's clear as daylight that his first two losses came at the hands of two A-side meth users. And Roger did say that A-side meth is strong. Before any one agrees and brings up Morales let me point out that Pacquiao didn't have his lucky socks that night.
1. Marcos Maidana
I thought he did enough to beat Kotelnik who is his only loss. He outworked him and deserved the W. He should have definitely gotten the nod.
2. Andre Direll
Yes he fought like a ***** against Froch which is why a lot of you think he deserved an L but he clearly outpointed froch. its not even disputable.
3. Manny Pacquiao
this man has been terrorizing bigger opponents. I think it's time we question the validity of his first two losses. It's clear as daylight that his first two losses came at the hands of two A-side meth users. And Roger did say that A-side meth is strong. Before any one agrees and brings up Morales let me point out that Pacquiao didn't have his lucky socks that night.
Comment