If ibeabuchi never got locked up, how much competition would he give the Klitchkos?

[O MINE ENEMY]

Both Klitschko's would've beaten Ike Ibeabuchi.

The guy allowed himself to be hit with too much leather.

[WladIsTheChamp]

if you think "makes you angry" is an excuse to assault women and children then how are you disciplined and focused? you sound like a ******ed gorilla

id only like to see ike come back if we were guaranteed to see him permanently wheelchair bound after to the fight

Green K for that, some ******s like the previous poster, make excuses for rapists and child killers all the time - they make excuses for Tyson, they make excuses for Valero, they makes excuses for Mayweather, and they make excuses for Ike. There is no reason to beat a woman or kill your wife, if you can't control yourself like that, you are an animal and deserve to be locked up. That's the difference between humans, and animals, humans are able to control their emotions. Obviously Ike is a crazy animal.

That's why and millions of people admire the Klitschkos - the nicest most polite, intelligent human beings but also master fighters - controled violence, it's a thing of beauty. Ike - animal.

[guru]

ike looked great against tua and byrd but they are 2 VERY different fighters from the klits. how ike would do against a much bigger, athletic, skilled klit is hard to say. how ike deals with the height/reach, the punishing jab followed by the right hand and getting tied up on the inside is unknown.

[WladIsTheChamp]

like I said, you don't know what happened.

And don't speak about things you don't know about. You can talk all you want but when the hard moment comes, you're not always as brave or as strong as you thought you would be.

That's something everyone who's been through the **** knows, and something sheltered people can't possibly be aware of.

LOL you are an idiot, so you are saying someone is "sheltered" because they view beating women half-to-death as wrong? What could a strong HW boxer like Ike have the reason to beat a **********? Because she didn't give him a good enough head or because she laughed at his tiny thing?

People like you make me sick...

Oh and the hard times you are talking about facing at one point, I am pretty sure normal people are not faced with a choice of whether to beat a prostitue or not...

[SN!PER]

We'll never know, but I think most agree that Ike would've won a few belts if the right opportunities happened for him.

Seeing his willpower and destructive energy in the ring, I must conclude he was a monster and could've beaten anyone in the HW division today except the Klitschkos. The brothers would be too smart for him and win on points, though his high workrate could give them long and hard battles.

Best fight would've been Ike vs. Lennox. Ike could've easily succeeded where Shannon Briggs failed.

[americanbot]

dude , weren't you the one asking for "proof" about fights?

you were asking for articles and **** earlier.

now you don't care what other people say because "you have your own individual brain"?

lmao

show me ONCE where i asked for a artical ******. someone made the claim that the whole world agreed with them. I told them to post the link to these so called MILLIONS of people agreeing with him. he couldn't.

YOU'VE BEEN OWNED A MILLION TIMES OVER CLOWN

[americanbot]

that idiot americanbot doesn't get it.

a slugfest and war is what tua wants.

when it's toe to toe , it's going well for tua.

when there's not much action and the opponents is boxing and jabbing , it's not going well for tua.


but of course the moron thinks if tua won by tko/ko , it was an easy fight.

no. in the 2nd bout rahman ACTUALLY DID box circles around tua & he landed the more meaningful blows. he was also consistent. the 1st bout was more of him moving, HUGGING, & landing here & there. while tua was landing the more meaningful blows. STOP THE LYING ALREADY YOU ****ING DIMWIT.

rahman was also ko'd in the 1st bout just to remind you.

you are the SAME ****** WHO THINKS IZON & TUA WAS JUST AS "BRUTAL" OF A SO CALLED WAR AS IKE VS TUA?

WHOHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!


PLENTY of guys have boxed tua ******. maskaev was a better BOXER then rahman & tried to box tua in the 90s but was unsuccessful. so no. tua doesn't NEED a slugfest.

you are the same ****** who thinks ike lost the tua fight because of commentators lol. Ike won the early rounds & stole a few middle rounds & tua took the later rounds.

GET LOST WITH YOUR ******ED PROPAGANDA LOON.

[paul750]

Well he's talked about every week it seems - and always will be. We will never know what he could have done. Not many boxers, past or present, could beat a prime Chris Byrd though. That's why any comparison to Sam Peter is so ridiculous. Sam Peter would have been beaten 10 times out of 10 against a prime Byrd. He was green in the Tua fight and looked to be an improved fighter against Byrd.

[DARKSEID]

Well he's talked about every week it seems - and always will be. We will never know what he could have done. Not many boxers, past or present, could beat a prime Chris Byrd though. That's why any comparison to Sam Peter is so ridiculous. Sam Peter would have been beaten 10 times out of 10 against a prime Byrd. He was green in the Tua fight and looked to be an improved fighter against Byrd.

Yep, I appreciate the klitschko's but a lot of these guys aren't giving Ike the credit he deserves.

[WladIsTheChamp]

Well he's talked about every week it seems - and always will be. We will never know what he could have done. Not many boxers, past or present, could beat a prime Chris Byrd though. That's why any comparison to Sam Peter is so ridiculous. Sam Peter would have been beaten 10 times out of 10 against a prime Byrd. He was green in the Tua fight and looked to be an improved fighter against Byrd.

Wlad beat a prime Byrd.