If ibeabuchi never got locked up, how much competition would he give the Klitchkos?

[americanbot]

let it go.

don't waste your time.

i seriously think the guy never even saw the fight.

he's just putting up a front to cover for when he thought i was talking about the 2nd fight because he didn't know rahman gave tua problems in the 1st fight.

NOPE i saw both bouts I just don't share your veiws. not only about the fight but about the tua that fought ike vs the one that fought rahman.

you come off like the tua that fought rahman was the SAME fighter who fought ike. (IGNORANCE) & you also ignore the fact that even though tua was more war torn in the rahman bout. rahman was still ko'd. you ignore this. ITS PATHETIC.

[americanbot]

You are so ****** you take things literally and use it as a defense.

I can post reputable boxing articles all day, but your dumb ass wouldn't read them.

You want 996,432 people.

The mark of a coward being picayune.

You know I am right.

Take a knee, biitch.

From Yahoo

Rahman (35-4-1, 29 knockouts) proved that he could box just as effectively today as he did in their first bout in December 1998 -- the first fight ending in controversy after Rahman, who was leading on the scorecards, was caught with a punch that landed after the bell late in the fight and was never allowed to recover from the illegal blow.

NO. I was just asking for what you CLAIMED you had IDIOT. you posting articals of fisher giving his opinion doesn't change this fact. the blow wasn't illegal. if you counted... the BELL rung right at the same time the blow landed.


YOU SOUND LIKE A NERD WHO BEATS OFF TO SOMETHING WEIRD LIKE A LIGHT BULB. YOUR BUTT SOUNDS EXTREMELY HURT.....

[Gorilla Dogs]

he was good but overrated. he could have beaten em but i give it to the klitschkos

[Left Hook Tua]

NOPE i saw both bouts I just don't share your veiws. not only about the fight but about the tua that fought ike vs the one that fought rahman.

you come off like the tua that fought rahman was the SAME fighter who fought ike. (IGNORANCE) & you also ignore the fact that even though tua was more war torn in the rahman bout. rahman was still ko'd. you ignore this. ITS PATHETIC.

i seriously doubt that.

anyone who saw the rahman fight knows tua struggled with rahman in the 1st fight.

if you saw the fights , you would realize that a lot of people thought tua squeaked it out again against ike and everyone thought it was a close fight.

everyone , except complete morons like yourself , thought tua was losing in the rahman fight until the tko.



tua was war worn and no longer the same a year later. lmfao

tua was tua until about 3-4 years later when he started blowing up to 240-250 lbs.

some people get washed up after 1 tough fight , tua wasn't one of them and he certainly wasn't after the ike fight.

tua has been in tough fights before ike. maskaev in the beginning , izon , etc.

izon-tua was just as brutal as tua-ike in fact.

oh wait , tua won those by tko , that must mean they didn't give him a hard time.

[Left Hook Tua]

this clown claims to have seen the fights.

he must've missed the parts when the hbo commentators thought tua beat ibeabuchi and the same commentators saying tua was losing to rahman.

why do people always want to argue things when they don't even know?

like they think people don't see through the front they're putting up?

[Spray_resistant]

BTW just putting this out there. I don't think the vitali & byrd fight was some type of dominating performance before the so called injury as klit fans will have you to believe. i felt that BEFORE the so called "injury" vitali was missing most of his shots (due to byrd) & started getting countured as the fight went on. THIS WAS WAY BEFORE the so called "injury" in the 5th byrd started countering vitali when he would make him miss.....the shots that vitali did land on byrd he eat them with a smile. byrd really didn't take a lot of damage in that fight i think vitali just got TIRED from missing so much and slowed down in the 5th. thats when byrd starting countering him....

He didn't give Byrd a massive beating but no way Byrd could have won more than 2 rounds. Sure Vitali was missing alot but Byrd didn't put forth much of an effective offensive effort.

To suggest that Vitali just got "tried" and quit for no reason other than that is silly in a fight he was dominating especially when he has been known to have the stamina to throw 1K punches in a fight no problem.

[americanbot]

i seriously doubt that.

anyone who saw the rahman fight knows tua struggled with rahman in the 1st fight.

if you saw the fights , you would realize that a lot of people thought tua squeaked it out again against ike and everyone thought it was a close fight.

everyone , except complete morons like yourself , thought tua was losing in the rahman fight until the tko.



tua was war worn and no longer the same a year later. lmfao

tua was tua until about 3-4 years later when he started blowing up to 240-250 lbs.

some people get washed up after 1 tough fight , tua wasn't one of them and he certainly wasn't after the ike fight.

tua has been in tough fights before ike. maskaev in the beginning , izon , etc.

izon-tua was just as brutal as tua-ike in fact.

oh wait , tua won those by tko , that must mean they didn't give him a hard time.

look. I'm gonna break this down for you as simple as i can put it.

YOU ARE TRYING to run in circles. I told you that i thought tua was the more effective of the 2. MY out look on that fight was who's more effective. whos landing the more meaningful blows. NOT who's controling the ring & using ring generalship. if you try to run in circles with this agian I'm gonna IGNORE it. because I've adressed it 100 times over & it's becoming repetitive & SICK.

next.


"tua was war worn and no longer the same a year later. lmfao"

YOU'RE QOUTING SOMETHING THAT CAME DIRECTLY OUT OF YOUR PINK HAIRY A** HOLE. I NEVER SAID THAT.

I said that tua after the ike bout was a lot more war torn then he was entering that fight. (he wasn't a all around WAR TORN fighter after the bout) he had been in one HELL of a fight though. A fight like that will take something out of any fighter. & he was undefeated going into that bout. my point was you couldn't compare tua who was FRESHER, undefeated (been in NO brutal wars) to the tua that fought rahman....BUT STILL KNOCKED OUT RAHMAN LOL

maskaev wasn't a brutal war u ******?? (although maskeaev was a GOOD fighter & went on to ko rahman)


YOUR OWN WORDS (AND THIS IS SIG WORTHY)


izon-tua was just as brutal as tua-ike in fact.


WHOOOOOOHAHAHAHAHAH MAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA!!!! HAHIBE*)N@)HN+@!!!



now i KNOW you are a BAFOON lol

[americanbot]

He didn't give Byrd a massive beating but no way Byrd could have won more than 2 rounds. Sure Vitali was missing alot but Byrd didn't put forth much of an effective offensive effort.

To suggest that Vitali just got "tried" and quit for no reason other than that is silly in a fight he was dominating especially when he has been known to have the stamina to throw 1K punches in a fight no problem.

i didn't say he quit (while trying to get out of danger) the fight just wasn't as brutal of a beating as people claim. & at times byrd even looked good when he would counter.

[americanbot]

this clown claims to have seen the fights.

he must've missed the parts when the hbo commentators thought tua beat ibeabuchi and the same commentators saying tua was losing to rahman.

why do people always want to argue things when they don't even know?

like they think people don't see through the front they're putting up?

HBO commentators are clowns...apart from the ones who've actually fought like lewis, roy, & foreman. otherwise their CLOWNS.

you are a IDIOT who has no brain of your own. if everyone else is following something you QUICKLY follow it too without a thought.

get your *own* individual brain.

[Tiozzo]

rahman did give tua more problems than ike.

ike fight was close throughout. rahman 1 wasn't close until tua won by tko.

you have to watch the fights. win-loss records don't show how the fights went.

if the first fight looked like the second fight, and maybe I'm wrong as I have seen only the second fight (or remember only the second fight), there is no doubt whatsoever that Rahman must have given way more problems to Tua than Ibeabuchi did because Rahman was working behind the jab and his defense was pretty sound whereas Ibeabuchi fought Tua toe to toe, giving Tua all the opportunities in the world to fight his own fight being comfortable on the inside, but Ibeabuchi ended up outworking and outfighting Tua

Rahman should have won the second fight actually