If he doesn't fight Pac he will forever be criticized. However, if he beats Williams or Martinez (Particularly Martinez) than whether he is criticized or not, he ranks higher than Pac.
If he doesn't fight Pac he will forever be criticized. However, if he beats Williams or Martinez (Particularly Martinez) than whether he is criticized or not, he ranks higher than Pac.
surely you don't me on the ATG list? Even if Floyd beats Manny, he will still be rated below Manny as far as most historians are concerned. Same reason Duran is above Hearns, and Pep is above sandler.
surely you don't me on the ATG list? Even if Floyd beats Manny, he will still be rated below Manny as far as most historians are concerned. Same reason Duran is above Hearns, and Pep is above sandler.
this is true, but if, and this is a big if, he fights and beats all three then hes def higher than pac.
If Floyd says screw the Pacaqiuo fight because of the complications of getting it done and fights the winner of Williams vs Martinez next is he still critcized of not getting the pac fight done?
the bold section answers it all. no need to bring in to the equation the names of williams, martinez, tyson, tua, hagler, cotto, margarito, torrecampo, etc.
If Floyd says screw the Pacaqiuo fight because of the complications of getting it done and fights the winner of Williams vs Martinez next is he still critcized of not getting the pac fight done?
The opening segment of this video should answer your question:
Comment