How Many Pacquiao Opponents Had 6inch Height And Reach Disadvantages?

[jrosales13]

none. imo, the only way margs beats pac is if pac doesnt come in this fight focused. doesnt mean pac is a bum doesnt mean margs size doesnt matter. but just because margs is bigger than pac doesnt mean he should beat him. a mentally focused fully prepared pac should not have a hard time with margarito irregardless of his disadvantage in size. speed > size on most days.

I don't think nobody in here is saying Marg should beat Pac or Marg could beat Pac.

The point of this thread. Is that it is ridiculous to say that if Marg win, which he really shouldn't but if he does size is not a factor. And, the only reason he won is because he beat Pac ass.

This thread is more of a response to another thread. Which the other thread didn't make sense at all.

Yes speed>size.

But, if Marg wins size played a factor. Or Pac didn't prepare at all.

To say other wise to me is ridiculous. Because, size I do not know what advantages Marg brings.

[Agent Mulder]

Right, OK....

So if Marg like you said has no chance. And, wins....

Would that mean that his size played a factor in it?

maybe. but more than likely it'll be a combination of his iron chin, his stamina, heavy hands and exhausting pressure. war tony!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

this thread is pointless. the only question that should be brought up is whether or not margarito actually has a chance of beating pacquiao. and given everything we know about these two, at least from a style perspective, the answer is no. & this is common knowledge to any real boxing head. but these tards wanna build this up much as much as possible. war margarito! i'm gunning for him to put as much pressure on the midget and wear him down a la cotto. but more than likely, that just won't happen. we'll just have to see!

PS. the time the thread starter has anything remotely negative to say about pacquaio doesn't exist.

Two years ago, "any real boxing head" would've laughed at the notion of Pacquiao even taking on Margarito, let alone beating him. So why now has it gone full circle and suddenly this is a mismatch in Pacs favour?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Two years ago, "any real boxing head" would've laughed at the notion of Pacquiao even taking on Margarito, let alone beating him. So why now has it gone full circle and suddenly this is a mismatch in Pacs favour?

Have you been under a rock the last 2 years?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Ive still yet to hear how Marg can use his size and to what degree. Still havent seen it broke down.

How will Marg use height and reach?

[Blooper]

Exactly Burner,

So Marg is suppose to hurt Pac with power that you don't think he posses.

Well if he can't hurt Pac and wins wouldn't that be because of size?

So to say size is not a factor is just ridiculous.

i think it's safe to say that if margs wins this fight it only means one thing...

pac sux.

i guarantee at least 20 threads declaring pac to be a sham.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Have you been under a rock the last 2 years?

Ok...Marg is "shot" now. I forgot.

But I thought we were talking about styles...

[jrosales13]

i think it's safe to say that if margs wins this fight it only means one thing...

pac sux.

i guarantee at least 20 threads declaring pac to be a sham.

Oh most def,

Pac sucks, overrated, hypejob, what have you.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Oh most def,

Pac sucks, overrated, hypejob, what have you.

Whats the alternative?

[Kagami Taiga]

i think it's safe to say that if margs wins this fight it only means one thing...

pac sux.

i guarantee at least 20 threads declaring pac to be a sham.

it def doesnt mean pac sucks but it would mean his heart isnt in boxing anymore. the only fight i think pac gets up for after this one is mayweather fight.