How Many Pacquiao Opponents Had 6inch Height And Reach Disadvantages?

[Agent Mulder]

this thread is pointless. the only question that should be brought up is whether or not margarito actually has a chance of beating pacquiao. and given everything we know about these two, at least from a style perspective, the answer is no. & this is common knowledge to any real boxing head. but these tards wanna build this up much as much as possible. war margarito! i'm gunning for him to put as much pressure on the midget and wear him down a la cotto. but more than likely, that just won't happen. we'll just have to see!

PS. the time the thread starter has anything remotely negative to say about pacquaio doesn't exist.

[Gorilla Dogs]

i cant think of any. floyd wouldnt move up to middle weight and fight the best there. chicken

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

whether you agree with it or not, margs has a major size and reach advantage.

whether he can use it to his advantage or not is another story.

i'm sorry burner but my head's starting to hurt trying to explain this to you.

Common sense says Marg has a height and reach advantage.

Okay thats established. Now what. Whats your point?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

this thread is pointless. the only question that should be brought up is whether or not margarito actually has a chance of beating pacquiao. and given everything we know about these two, at least from a style perspective, the answer is no. & this is common knowledge to any real boxing head. but these tards wanna build this up much as much as possible. war margarito! i'm gunning for him to put as much pressure on the midget and wear him down a la cotto. but more than likely, that just won't happen. we'll just have to see!

PS. the time the thread starter has anything remotely negative to say about pacquaio doesn't exist.

its so pointless that you felt the need to post your worthless opinion on it...makes sense

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

this thread is pointless. the only question that should be brought up is whether or not margarito actually has a chance of beating pacquiao. and given everything we know about these two, at least from a style perspective, the answer is no. & this is common knowledge to any real boxing head. but these tards wanna build this up much as much as possible. war margarito! i'm gunning for him to put as much pressure on the midget and wear him down a la cotto. but more than likely, that just won't happen. we'll just have to see!

PS. the time the thread starter has anything remotely negative to say about pacquaio doesn't exist.

Great post..............

[Gorilla Dogs]

Common sense says Marg has a height and reach advantage.

Okay thats established. Now what. Whats your point?

LOL @ thinking margarito will beat pacquiao hahahha

[jrosales13]

jro, are you giving pac credit if he wins?

I think there were better fights for Pac. That would of been better for his legacy than what Marg will be. I don't think Marg because of his scandal and how he looked when he got busted does anything for Pac legacy.

I would not give Pac credit for his 8 division title. I don't think the winner of this fight should be called a champ in the JMW division. I think this whole vacant title and in a catch-weight is kind of bogus. Especially since neither one has done anything in this division as of yet. I really do wish the title wasn't on the line.

I think there were more deserving fighters like Berto. HOWEVER, I think Marg is a tougher fight for Pac than Berto would have been, I think Marg is more of a threat than Berto and more than say Alexander. Who a lot of people were really high on before the Kotelnik fight. I have always said that Marg would be a tougher fight for Pac then those 2 guys.

So I would give him credit but not that much. Just cuz of Marg after the wraps still being a question mark. I just wish that Marg would of had one more fight against a higher caliber opponent before this fight just to see where he was at and had left.

So, yes credit for the win not a lot but some. But, no I will not give him any credit as being champ or 8 division title holder or what have you.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Common sense says Marg has a height and reach advantage.

and yet you try to argue otherwise...hence you have an issue with common sense...this is well known

[Kagami Taiga]

size always matters, but it is not a determining factor in this fight. pac should beat margs, no matter how u look at it. so pac is the smaller man, so what, whats new??? u guys keep talking about this size **** like its the only drawing point of this fight. now ask yourself, what does that say???

margs only hope is his size. lol.

[jrosales13]

this thread is pointless. the only question that should be brought up is whether or not margarito actually has a chance of beating pacquiao. and given everything we know about these two, at least from a style perspective, the answer is no. & this is common knowledge to any real boxing head. but these tards wanna build this up much as much as possible. war margarito! i'm gunning for him to put as much pressure on the midget and wear him down a la cotto. but more than likely, that just won't happen. we'll just have to see!

PS. the time the thread starter has anything remotely negative to say about pacquaio doesn't exist.

Right, OK....

So if Marg like you said has no chance. And, wins....

Would that mean that his size played a factor in it?