Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Many Pacquiao Opponents Had 6inch Height And Reach Disadvantages?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
    Wait are you telling me Pac has NEVER been the bigger man in his fight?

    Please tell em thats not what your saying.

    In my thread I didnt say Pac has had 6 inches of height and reach on his opponents. I just said there has been several times when Pac was the bigger man. I,e,: Both JMM fights.
    your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

    so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

    i thought that was pretty simple to understand.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
      Wait are you telling me Pac has NEVER been the bigger man in his fights?

      Please tell me thats not what your saying.

      In my thread I didnt say Pac has had 6 inches of height and reach on his opponents. I just said there has been several times when Pac was the bigger man. I.e: Both JMM fights.


      so now you're comparing the size differential of PAC-Margs to that of PAC-JMM?


      please stop watching boxing

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Blooper View Post
        your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

        so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

        i thought that was pretty simple to understand.


        it is simple...but Burner needs special help...i should have posted pictures to help but **** it...let him get dizzy thinking about it

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by -pound4pound- View Post
          it is simple...but Burner needs special help...i should have posted pictures to help but **** it...let him get dizzy thinking about it
          dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

          i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Blooper View Post
            your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

            so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

            i thought that was pretty simple to understand.
            The point is Pac has been the bigger man in his fights before. So now all of sudden when he fights Margarito people are acting like this is David vs. Goliath.

            Its not. Marg doesnt use his height.

            And how much did it look Clottey weighed to you? 165?

            And Pac had him scared to throw. And on top of that Clottey is stronger than Margarito and even bullied Margarito when they fought until he hurt his hand.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Blooper View Post
              dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

              i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.
              Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Blooper View Post
                dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

                i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.


                of course he is...this dude has bet incorrectly to almost all PAC fights...i remember when he was acting like an honorary Brit when PAC was about to fight Ricky...i guess it finally sunk in; its better to not give credit than to be proven an idiot with your picks

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                  Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.
                  this ****** asss ran away from his own ****** asss ridiculous thread.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                    The point is Pac has been the bigger man in his fights before. So now all of sudden when he fights Margarito people are acting like this is David vs. Goliath.

                    Its not. Marg doesnt use his height.

                    And how much did it look Clottey weighed to you? 165?

                    And Pac had him scared to throw. And on top of that Clottey is stronger than Margarito and even bullied Margarito when they fought until he hurt his hand.
                    whether you agree with it or not, margs has a major size and reach advantage.

                    whether he can use it to his advantage or not is another story.

                    i'm sorry burner but my head's starting to hurt trying to explain this to you.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                      Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.



                      anyone who uses Antonio Margarito as a tune-up, stay busy fight deserves credit for getting a win


                      ESPECIALLY when that person has a 6inch height and reach disadvantage




                      you can leave now

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP