Erik Morales gives Manny Pacquiao a boxing lesson (VIDEO)

[JK1700]

Despite being old, past his prime and losing his last fight to Marco Antonio Barrera, Erik Morales gives Manny Pacquiao a boxing lesson. Freddie Roach, before the fight, was quoted as saying "Morales has nothing left, we'll walk right through him!"

This didnt happen. Pacquiao was outboxed, outworked and embarrassed by Morales who hit him completely at will. Morales also cut Pacquiao who was reduced to running away at times in need of a rest. After the fight the "humble" Pacquiao refused to give Morales any credit for beating him and claimed he lost because of "clitoris gloves". Team Pacquiao waited 1 year after this fight to rematch a drained and shot Morales coming off a lopsided decision loss to Zahir Raheem. Who they declined to fight.


https://<object width="480" height="...mbed></object>

https://<object width="480" height="...mbed></object>

https://<object width="480" height="...mbed></object>

[Carpe Diem]

Now you can't be complaining about getting red K's from Manny's fans. You've dug your own grave.

[DET. IRONSIDE]

The fights between these guys are golden. Probably the best trilogy of modern times and is right up there with Morales/Barrera in my opinion.

Funny how Floyd managed to avoid a fight with either Erik or MAB despite winning belts in the same divisions they fought in.

[JK1700]

Now you can't be complaining about getting red K's from Manny's fans. You've dug your own grave.

When did I ever complain about that? Your comment is pointless!

[JK1700]

The fights between these guys are golden. Probably the best trilogy of modern times and is right up there with Morales/Barrera in my opinion.

Funny how Floyd managed to avoid a fight with either Erik or MAB despite winning belts in the same divisions they fought in.

It's funny how people can be so ignorant!

When was Floyd champion at 130? From late 1998 to late 2001.

When was Morales at 130? He moved up in late 2003 and didnt win a belt until Fabruary 2004. Barrera didnt fight at 130 until December 2004.

[JK1700]

The fights between these guys are golden. Probably the best trilogy of modern times and is right up there with Morales/Barrera in my opinion.Funny how Floyd managed to avoid a fight with either Erik or MAB despite winning belts in the same divisions they fought in.

There should never have been a trilogy because after easily defeating Pacquiao, Morales was dominated in a lopsided loss to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao had any courage he would have fought Raheem at 135 right? Well he instead elected to duck Raheem and fight Morales twice more at 130. Yes it was Erik's decision to agree to the 130lb weight but why didnt Pacquiao fight the winner? I guess it's proberbly the same reason why he didnt fight the winner of Mosley/Margarito or Mayweather/Hatton.

That's one thing you can't take away from Floyd. He actually fights the best fighters in their prime at their best weight. Unlike Pacquiao who fights the losers of big fights at catchweights for vacant belts.

But yeah. "Pacman fights the best and Floyd is a cherrypicker"

Keep dreaming. idiots.

[PainKiller]

I agree that Morales gave Manny a good fight.

Without the cut and a better weight for Manny, he won.

However, I am glad Pac actually improved.

[PainKiller]

There should never have been a trilogy because after easily defeating Pacquiao, Morales was dominated in a lopsided loss to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao had any courage he would have fought Raheem at 135 right? Well he instead elected to duck Raheem and fight Morales twice more at 130. Yes it was Erik's decision to agree to the 130lb weight but why didnt Pacquiao fight the winner? I guess it's proberbly the same reason why he didnt fight the winner of Mosley/Margarito or Mayweather/Hatton.

That's one thing you can't take away from Floyd. He actually fights the best fighters in their prime at their best weight. Unlike Pacquiao who fights the losers of big fights at catchweights for vacant belts.

But yeah. "Pacman fights the best and Floyd is a cherrypicker"

Keep dreaming. idiots.

So Floyd has not cherry picked?

Okay I am out of here.

[check hook]

The fights between these guys are golden. Probably the best trilogy of modern times and is right up there with Morales/Barrera in my opinion.

Funny how Floyd managed to avoid a fight with either Erik or MAB despite winning belts in the same divisions they fought in.

DUMBASS!!!!!

[DET. IRONSIDE]

There should never have been a trilogy because after easily defeating Pacquiao, Morales was dominated in a lopsided loss to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao had any courage he would have fought Raheem at 135 right? Well he instead elected to duck Raheem and fight Morales twice more at 130. Yes it was Erik's decision to agree to the 130lb weight but why didnt Pacquiao fight the winner? I guess it's proberbly the same reason why he didnt fight the winner of Mosley/Margarito or Mayweather/Hatton.

That's one thing you can't take away from Floyd. He actually fights the best fighters in their prime at their best weight. Unlike Pacquiao who fights the losers of big fights at catchweights for vacant belts.

But yeah. "Pacman fights the best and Floyd is a cherrypicker"

Keep dreaming. idiots.

Read my post, I never said that I just staed the facts.

Still think Morales is better than both of them.