Huh? Speaking of idiots, terrible analogy.
Everybody's reasoning here, and most likely Pac's team as well because apparently you're all on the same level of reasoning (bricks), is that because Mayweather weighed in at '46 against Marquez, that he's going to do that to Pacquiao without that penalty. This is where you all die on this reasoning.
If Pacquiao wanted the fight at '44, the $10 million penalty makes all the sense in the world because Mayweather was willing to dish out $300,000 per lb. easy. $10 million, not so much because he may have to force himself excessively to make '44. This is how Pacquiao's team works.
So they want the fight at '47 and want to throw out an outrageous penalty at a weight that Mayweather has no past of failing to make, Mayweather agreed the next day... "let's fight."
Enter; Pacquiao excuses in the boatloads.
Everybody's reasoning here, and most likely Pac's team as well because apparently you're all on the same level of reasoning (bricks), is that because Mayweather weighed in at '46 against Marquez, that he's going to do that to Pacquiao without that penalty. This is where you all die on this reasoning.
If Pacquiao wanted the fight at '44, the $10 million penalty makes all the sense in the world because Mayweather was willing to dish out $300,000 per lb. easy. $10 million, not so much because he may have to force himself excessively to make '44. This is how Pacquiao's team works.
So they want the fight at '47 and want to throw out an outrageous penalty at a weight that Mayweather has no past of failing to make, Mayweather agreed the next day... "let's fight."
Enter; Pacquiao excuses in the boatloads.
Comment